Alex Jones: "Somalis were slave masters" Far-Right attack on Ilhan continues

[The alchemist]

Without a shadow of a doubt, the Turks that the Sahaba dealt with in the early days of Islam, look nothing like the Turks of today. I'm pretty sure, they were mongoloid back then. Today, thanks to centuries of mixing with Greeks and Slavs, has made them lose much of their mongoloid features. But you can still see it in some Turks still. Specially in those living in the rural, central parts of Anatolia. Just check out footballer Mesut Ozil......look at those eyes.

View attachment 75675

I think the modern Turkish people have more or less 25 percent Turkic in their genes. The rest of their genetic makeup is native and neighboring groups.

I don't think Byzantines were Mongoloid-looking Turkic, because that part of their ancestry didn't arrive before the 11th century. And that Turkic group that came to the Anatolian basin in the 11th century were probably not entirely Mongoloid because they had considerable contact with other groups in the middle-east.

 

[Peaches]

What a nice history lesson.

I love that he is completely shameless, he might as well say we are aliens (the fourheads!!). It doesnt mater because "fake news" spread like wild fire and people are hungry for new material on ilhaan

i guess the incest thing didnt suffice.

 

[moravia]

Ilhan omar is just your typical sjw xalimo.

 

[Dino]

Ilhan omar is a sorry excuse for a congresswoman. And i am a somali. Why should people hide their opinions? Because someone might use our opinions to attack hers? Nah it does not work that way.

Ilhan omar does nothing apart from tweet fight. She is useless and contributes nothing to congress. She lacks self awareness and she does not have the humility to maybe be quiet put your head down, listen to her seniors get some legislative accomplishments like klobuchar and help the people of minessota.

 

[World]

Actually, Modern Turks genetically have little to do with the actual small group of "real" Turks that invaded Anatolia. There was no population replacement in Anatolia, as a result Modern Turks descend Native Anatolians/Greeks, Kurds & Armenians with only minor Turkic admixture.

Actually, this is not true. Modern Turks owe 25-45 % of their ancestry to Turks who invaded Anatolia during the Middle Ages.

The Turks who invaded Anatolia were around 40-50 % East Euroasian/Mongolian and not 100 %.

 

[Crow]

My favourite part was when he talked about our mass enslavement of Ethiopians. Really takes me back to my previous life when I had 18 concubines scrubbing the floors of my castle.

 

[Timo Jareer and proud]

My favourite part was when he talked about our mass enslavement of Muslims. Really takes me back to my previous life when I had 18 Somali concubines scrubbing the floors of my castle in Axum.

So in your previous life... You were Amhara?

 

[Crow]

So in your previous life... You were Amhara?

You almost gave me a heart attack! I thought I wrote that by accident for a second.

 

[Timo Jareer and proud]

You almost gave me a heart attack! I thought I wrote that by accident for a second.

Imagine the irony tho. A Abyssinian 15th century king with 18 Somali cocumbines later reincarnated as a Majerteen Somali that frequently insults Habeshas calling them bug eyed midgets.

 

[NAAFO]

Most of Africa enslaved itself, tribe to tribe, kingdom to kingdom, just like Europe and the entire world did.

That’s why West Africans had no problem selling what came to be the African Americans slaves to foreigners. They weren’t selling their people. It was other subjugated tribes being sold as was custom.

Why it’s a point of pride that some Somalis had slaves, as if it’s a positive or a unique feature is unintelligible.

@VixR You contradict yourself you admit that they sold a certain amount of their people specifically what became known as african american's, afro caribbeans as well as elsewhere within the americas however even if they were certain tribes that had disputes with each other the rational of it being a feudal society isn't really necessarily valid as somalia was also a feudal and most would say still is today however somali's that had disputes with rival tribes didn't sell those that were captured as POWs weren't sold to foreigners whether it be european's or arab's, which can't be said for west africans what I'm saying is that it doesn't really matter whether these enslaved people didn't come from the same tribe as those that were on that occasion practicing slavery I.E. doing the enslaving being the slave masters themselves and serving as the gurantor & middlemen and subsequently being complicit in the subjectation and suffering of their yes their people as these brothers and sisters that they sold from rival adverserial tribes that eventually became fellow country men & women when europeans made the borders which is indicated by the fante-ashanti war the ashanti initially started selling fante men, women, children and which the fante reciprocated the point I'm making sister is it doesn't matter if their weren't any borders and the society at that time was a primitive one these people were still sadistically inhumane to their own people which alhamdulillah we weren't back then authentic pure somali culture devoid of any external influences like arab, african, secular liberal feminists, ideaologies has always had a undercurrent of egalitarian and rich progressive traditions the reason it hasn't been that way for a while is because we've deviated we need to go back to "the old way" please walaasheyda (my sister) what is it that you say across the atlantic lol damage control please don't damage control by indulging yourself in the futility of semantics

 

[Vanessa]

He's a comedian

 

[Timo Jareer and proud]

THE VIDEO IS DELETED NOOOOOOOOO

 

[The_Kong Dong]

Elite African, great name for a drink

:siilaanyolaugh:

 

[Sophisticate]

You don’t know that either. The bolded statement is unlikely. This is me being shrewd. No one wants to go in that direction, but as soon as you make a statement like that, it becomes a testable idea and a possible point of contention.

It's hinted at through Xeer (unwritten system of laws) practiced by ethnic Somalis, as we know them which clearly stated that slavery of a fellow Somali was forbidden. And one has to first engage in that practice first as a requisite for a system of slavery and exportation of Somalis from hostile tribes which did not occur. However, Somalis would kill as opposed to capture men and boys from opposing qabils (in a conflict situation/raid).

When Somalis make the claim they were never enslaved they are referring to no mass enslavement. I don't know any other African tribes that practiced such as system.