5pillars criticise muslim women for watching barbie

[cooli3o]

Barbie is a toy.

barbie has a boyfriend ken, what do boyfriend and girlfriend do

 

[Angelina]

barbie has a boyfriend ken, what do boyfriend and girlfriend do

Ken is a plastic toy as is Barbie.

 

[cooli3o]

Barbie also dresses like a promiscuous women, setting an example in kids heads that a dolled up women with makeup and promiscuous outfit which was probably designed by men and shown as the standard of beauty for women which men are attracted to are some kind of role model

 

[cooli3o]

Ken is a plastic toy as is Barbie.

You do realise ken is barbies boyfriend though right?

 

[Angelina]

You do realise ken is barbies boyfriend though right?

Lol I thought you were joking when you were talking about a plastic toy being a ho.

 

[cooli3o]

Women are the majority of heaven and hell. These niggas tried it.

there are different opinions, the women who are majority in heaven are not always said to be the women of the dunya rather the huurul ayn, another opinion says the women in hell will eventually go heaven,

 

[Angelina]

there are different opinions, the women who are majority in heaven are not always said to be the women of the dunya rather the huurul ayn, another opinion says the women in hell will eventually go heaven,

Nope, Abu Huraira was clearly talking about the men having two wives who are of the dunya. The Hadith literally starts of with references of people debating about men or women will be the majority in Jannah.

 

[Hamzza]

You’re a perfect example of when someone is so caught up with liberalism/westernization and Islamic speakers disputes that you don’t even fact check the actual article at hand. Elias literally copied and pasted authentic Hadith and medieval classical scholars commentary and those works are also posted by Islamqa.org as well. None of it was his mere opinion.

This is very embarrassing for you indeed. How is the point of women being the majority in heaven a Western point when Abu Hurraira and Ibn Hajar discuss this and there commentary and books are clearly referenced not just on his site but others?

Also, right you’re slandering that Elias man show me one article in which he has endorsed LGTB or anything of that nature or any form of Westernization that goes against the deen. Show me, something tells me you’ll be hard pressed.

@Omar del Sur is saying be skeptical of everything this site posts as they promote liberalism and equality bullshit and he is 100% right. you can't trust the likes of Yaqeen so you have to always double-check the information they post.

 

[cooli3o]

Lol I thought you were joking when you were talking about a plastic toy being a ho.

I am dawahman said it in a lecture once and I laughed when I heard it so I just say it cos its funny but I say stuff like that to provoke a reaction so that I can move onto my main point which is that barbie is like the western idea of what a women should be
dress like a promiscuous women and have a boyfriend called ken, subliminal messages that zina is ok and to dress like that is ok

 

[Angelina]

@Omar del Sur is saying be skeptical of everything this site posts as they promote liberalism and equality bullshit and he is 100% right. you can't trust the likes of Yaqeen so you have to always double-check the information they post.

I really couldn’t give a toss about the whole Yaqeen institute as I’m unfamiliar with their institutions and don’t listen to them. But Elias from what I’ve seen hasn’t wrote anything remotely haram or Western. Saying he does is slanderous at this point unless YOU can actually show me something HE wrote. Even if some of his views may seem apologist his references are still views of medieval scholars like Ibn HAjar ect. He also references the books he takes from which are easily researched. Hence why I like his site. He relies on classic commentary.

 

[cooli3o]

Nope, Abu Huraira was clearly talking about the men having two wives who are of the dunya. The Hadith literally starts of with references of people debating about men or women will be the majority in Jannah.

there are different understandings of this hadeeth
on of them being that the women who were in the hellfire who were Muslim eventually left and went to jannah.
there are different opinions on what this means, but it is irrelevant, as we know that women are majority of the hellfire, and the Prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم gave a reason as to why they were in the hellfire, which was due to a sin that they did.
so this entire thing is irrelevant, I don't even know why anyone cares, your not going to hell just because your a women

 

[cooli3o]

@Omar del Sur is saying be skeptical of everything this site posts as they promote liberalism and equality bullshit and he is 100% right. you can't trust the likes of Yaqeen so you have to always double-check the information they post.

Why can't I be skeptical of Islamqa then

 

[Hamzza]

Why can't I be skeptical of Islamqa then

Who said you can't be skeptical of Islamqa?

I don't 100% trust anything on the internet

 

[Angelina]

there are different understandings of this hadeeth
on of them being that the women who were in the hellfire who were Muslim eventually left and went to jannah.
there are different opinions on what this means, but it is irrelevant, as we know that women are majority of the hellfire, and the Prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم gave a reason as to why they were in the hellfire, which was due to a sin that they did.
so this entire thing is irrelevant, I don't even know why anyone cares, your not going to hell just because your a women

It isn’t irrelevant as the whole debate was about whether women will be the majority in heaven.

 

[cooli3o]

Who said you can't be skeptical of Islamqa?

I don't 100% trust anything on the internet

well then I would assume if your skeptical of everything you would be just with everything, so I don't see a reason why you would reject some from yaqeen institute just because its yaqeen or even someone associated with them

 

[cooli3o]

It isn’t irrelevant as the whole debate was about whether women will be the majority in heaven.

u mean the debate in this thread?

 

[Angelina]

Who said you can't be skeptical of Islamqa?

I don't 100% trust anything on the internet

Random questions:

1. Are you proficient in Arabic?

2. What scholars do you take from?

3. Have you studied under scholars?

 

[Hamzza]

well then I would assume if your skeptical of everything you would be just with everything, so I don't see a reason why you would reject some from yaqeen institute just because its yaqeen or even someone associated with them

Double-checking something =/ rejecting it

 

[Hamzza]

Random questions:

1. Are you proficient in Arabic?

2. What scholars do you take from?

3. Have you studied under scholars?

1. I'd like to think so, to an extent

2. Obviously Somali scholars. The amount of Islamic resources available in Af Somali is unparalleled by any other Ajami language

3. I'm not Talibul Ilm at the moment but yes I've studied under scholars since I was 9

 

[Angelina]

@Hamzza

There seems to be a bit of hypocrisy. Why are Al Yaqeen or whatever they’re called being called out for posting women, when 5 pillars have literally recorded Muslim women at the cinema without their consent and it’s been posted on this very forum and on twitter no one has an issue with it. I don’t see anyone calling out 5 pillars for that. There seems to be a lot of contradictions tbh. It’s confusing for us laymen. As for the association with alphabet deviants then that is wrong.