Now we are getting somewhere, this is the level where, if we discuss things calmly and without emotion, we might actually find a middle point that we can agree on, or find a solution to an issue.
I understand where you're coming from with you points, but you must understand something.
1. The safe haven was not a safe haven, but a brain drain, that's why Somalis run shit in Kenya, those weren't just farmers, but our highest and most educated elite.
2. The land that they gave us a safe haven with, belongs to us, and belonged to us less 35 or so years before the civil war.
NFD was annexed at the same time as Socotra. Fully in 1967.
Than put us in 
concentration camps which also became rape camps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Eastern_Province_(Kenya)#Administration
Safehaven you say, I think not.
3. As for Al-Kebab, even the 
UNITED NATIONS will tell you that Kenya are their handlers
https://www.strategypage.com/qnd/somalia/articles/20060823.aspx
"August 22, 2006: The Islamic Courts banned most exports to the UAE (United Arab Emirates) and promised to reform the way the Somali economy is run. This could raise serious problems, as the taxation of exports is a major source of income for several warlords and tribes. It's uncertain if there will be a fight over this."
Madbobe comes in immediately after, than suddenly this
http://www.nation.co.ke/news/Al-Sha...Kismayo/-/1056/2487978/-/103vdhk/-/index.html
"
UN claims Al-Shabaab freely exports charcoal from KDF controlled Kismayu Port"
Which was proven by the way
http://magazine.africageographic.com/weekly/issue-1/how-charcoal-fuels-al-shabaabs-terror-campaign/
"How charcoal funds Al-Shabab's terror campaigns"
And for the finale
http://www.voanews.com/a/reu-un-say...d-llegal-somalia-charcoal-export/1701424.html
"
UN: Kenyan Peacekeepers Aided Illegal Somalia Charcoal Export"
Don't fall for Hegalian diaclectic of being forced to choose between those two.
I don't care about either of them, I'll support whomever decreases the suffering of our people.