Yes, the moon landing was fake.

[Omar del Sur]

Image forensics shows that lighting on the footage comes from parallel rays, which is a result of the sun being 100 million kilometres from the moon.

TV studio lights or any other lighting system in 1969 would not be able to recreate parallel rays.

To recreate the parallel rays in 1969 would have required millions of laser beams stuck together. However, that would have cost more than going to the moon itself as well as the simple fact that laser beams in 1969 were only in the colour red.

That means the footage would have looked like a shady Amsterdam brothel.

It is a consensus amongst film experts and image forensics that the faking the moon landing was impossible.

and how did Nixon call the moon?

 

[Periplus]

and how did Nixon call the moon?

He called Mission Control in Houston, which patched him through the radio.

Or did you seriously think they had landline telephones on the Moon.

 

[Amber]

you never cease to amaze me. @Omar del Sur Even if you disgust me

 

[Omar del Sur]

He called Mission Control in Houston, which patched him through the radio.

 

[Omar del Sur]

you never cease to amaze me. @Omar del Sur Even if you disgust me

meanwhile I have no idea who you are.

 

[Amber]

meanwhile I have no idea who you are.

and you think I give a f*ck?

 

[Omar del Sur]

look, person. I am not reading what you said and I have no idea who you are. k

 

[Amber]

look, person. I am not reading what you said and I have no idea who you are. k

everyone knows you're a bit koo koo to the head. You keep believing I care about your responses and be you

 

[Periplus]

View attachment 248753

There are literal phone records from AT&T that prove this.