I wouldnβt say that, the issue is that with physically attractive men are not easy to come by and usually when you do see them theyβre taken, being pursued by 10+ other girls, or is a dirty player.
which is why some of them f*** with what they actually prefer on the DL.
You'd be surprised at the amount of muslim that operate that way
I go based of where I live tbh, in Uk we don't really do that
lol maybe you picked the wrong person for this job, because I don't know if looks matter to me or not. it's the combination of everything together for me.
like normally I might not find X feature attractive, but if I already like the guy, than everything about him I will too.
lol maybe you picked the wrong person for this job, because I don't know if looks matter to me or not. it's the combination of everything together for me.
Not quite.
Looks are a hook and not the problem. It's what comes after that is more important. A novel mind is what intrigues me enough to investigate further.Why assume they are taken, unfaithful or have a large following? Operating from that framework could even mentally block one from pursuing a man who is attractive, reliable, financially stable, educated and receptive. Especially when mischaracterizing from the beginning. I don't think looks are a barometer of the capacity to be in a fulfilling relationship nor are they telling of someone's moral foundation or capacity for fidelity. There are plenty of unattractive men that are taken, entitled and players too. I disagree. I think the major issue is interpersonal rather than aesthetic. Also, people on average tend to marry someone at a similar level of physical attractiveness. There usually isn't a huge mismatch. I think we should interrogate whether he is similarly credentialed, educated or even in the same tax bracket or higher. And whether he scores high on agreeableness, optimism and conflict resolution/mediation. Particularly if our focus is on marital longevity.
I couldβve sworn I remember you saying youβd check the digital footprint of a man youβre seeing to see if he had a player pastβ¦..Not quite.
Why assume they are taken, unfaithful or have a large following? Operating from that framework could even mentally block one from pursuing a man who is attractive, reliable, financially stable, educated and receptive. Especially when mischaracterizing from the beginning. I don't think looks are a barometer of the capacity to be in a fulfilling relationship nor are they telling of someone's moral foundation or capacity for fidelity. There are plenty of unattractive men that are taken, entitled and players too. I disagree. I think the major issue is interpersonal rather than aesthetic. Also, people on average tend to marry someone at a similar level of physical attractiveness. There usually isn't a huge mismatch. I think we should interrogate whether is he similarly credentialed, educated or even in the same tax bracket or higher. And whether he scores high on agreeableness, optimism and conflict resolution/mediation is important. Particularly if our focus is on marital longevity.
I say a lot of things. It's your duty to sift fact from fiction.
I once knew a golem-looking guy that became a social media influencer. He got too big for his britches and started hair-tossing his wispy mane as a mating ritual to potentials. His DM was full of qumayos who were more hideous than him. Clearly, out of his league. I had to withdraw interest. I felt threatened by his xuuxness and capacity to obtain someone unrivalled in grotesqueness.Opposite way round
2 negatives make a positive
