Without the european exploration

Status
Not open for further replies.
Europe would have never advanced as it did
The only reason europe advanced the way it did was because of the profit they made exploiting less advanced people
Its not about enlightnment or renaissence,the only reason vasco and colombus made the trip was to find a way around the ottomans which at that time were at their peak richer and more advanced than europe,not meant for exploration,study or whatever ottoman controlled the trading roots
If you noticed early european explorers were more successful in the americas which didnt even have metal weapons(if a primitive race like the bantus can wipe out other races because they used metal,what about a race with gunpodwer power?),a vast land with abundant resource from there they become extremely wealthy which lead to advantage in advancing compared to the rest of the world,but they couldnt do the same to other civilization with a somewhat more advance culture (like india,ajuuraan,persia,china,gulf countries like oman,other african states) at the that time,later on because of the wealth they made which helped facilitate their scientific,technological advancement and control over world trade and after 400year since the first exploration did they start to become brave enough to colonize countries like china and india,africa,
 

Apollo

VIP
Europe would have never advanced as it did
The only reason europe advanced the way it did was because of the profit they made exploiting less advanced people
Its not about enlightnment or renaissence,the only reason vasco and colombus made the trip was to find a way around the ottomans which at that time were at their peak richer and more advanced than europe,not meant for exploration,study or whatever ottoman controlled the trading roots
If you noticed early european explorers were more successful in the americas which didnt even have metal weapons(if a primitive race like the bantus can wipe out other races because they used metal,what about a race with gunpodwer power?),a vast land with abundant resource from there they become extremely wealthy which lead to advantage in advancing compared to the rest of the world,but they couldnt do the same to other civilization with a somewhat more advance culture (like india,ajuuraan,persia,china,gulf countries like oman,other african states) at the that time,later on because of the wealth they made which helped facilitate their scientific,technological advancement and control over world trade and after 400year since the first exploration did they start to become brave enough to colonize countries like china and india,africa,

Wrong.

The scientific revolution around 1500-1600 with Francis Bacon / Newton starting it was what made them win.

The discovery of the Americas only accelerated the winning, but the winning was guaranteed with the scientific revolution and subsequent industrial revolution.
 
The scientific revolution around 1500-1600 with Francis Bacon / Newton starting it was what made them win.
Scientific revolution never garantied the level of advancement europe achieved,it played major part,but it was the profit they made from colonilisation,without it the scientif revolution would have just died out,wealth is everything
 

Apollo

VIP
Scientific revolution never garantied the level of advancement europe achieved,it played major part,but it was the profit they made from colonilisation,without it the scientif revolution would have just died out,wealth is everything

We are speaking in Anglo-Saxon because the English were the Industrial Revolution Kangz.
 
Yes

You just need to copy the white man and you will be wealthy too
Who told you they copied the whiteman,whats wrong with you warya,the whitemen just treated singapor and japan like a company,the wealth they get is from trading with wealthy western countries under terms which benefit the west like the trade routes are controlled by US marine,those countries are more supermarket than countries but i am not an expert but you are terribly misinformed isnt business your field how can you say something as shallow as you just did
 
We are speaking in Anglo-Saxon because the English were the Industrial Revolution Kangz.
Didnt the industrial revolution started later on
Science without wealth means nothing thats why brain drain exist,money means everything and one made more profit in history that the european powers they had easy access to
 

Apollo

VIP
Didnt the industrial revolution started later on
Science without wealth means nothing thats why brain drain exist,money means everything and one made more profit in history that the european powers they had easy access to

China was richer than Europe but because of their authoritarian and collectivist nature they did not allow for free speech and scientific independence from government (Emperor) interference.
 
China was richer than Europe but because of their authoritarian and collectivist nature they did not allow for free speech and scientific independence from government (Emperor) interference.
Any nation in history which was wealthy had some advancement in science,but their was no nation more wealthy than europe after the exploration,they had the luxury of having knowlegde from china to west asia,and by pure luck found the americas which they found the wealth to help to fund their scientific advancement
 
Any nation in history which was wealthy had some advancement in science,but their was no nation more wealthy than europe after the exploration,they had the luxury of having knowlegde from china to west asia,and by pure luck found the americas which they found the wealth to help to fund their scientific advancement
It seems like you belittle European efforts, its almost like you're saying other countries could if they were luckier.
 
I am not saying that europes scientific revolutıon had no part or the mindset(enlightment)which welcomed new idea had no part
they could have been advanced but not the level they achieved without the money they got from colonilisaton
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending

Top