What are you talking about? Nomadic Moroccans or nomads literally anywhere were not living any more "advanced" lives than Geeljires. Hell,
our tents are more complicated and architecturally impressive than
theirs, to be fully honest. I don't know if you know this but most of Somaliweyn is arid and is not conducive to a settled, agricultural or urban lifestyle so please explain why nomads would take the time to build large stone towns or structures? So they can die of dehydration while wasting time doing this in a desert?
This shit sounds like the same ridiculous crap I hear when MENAs like Iranians hate on Khaleejis for being "nomadic barbarians" like they can't see how desolate and barren most of the Peninsula is and that the Bedouin of life is usually the only viable way to live in such a region and that when settlements do pop up they're usually just somewhat half-decent sized coastal towns or towns centered on oases that never compare to those of Egypt or Mesopotomia not because Khaleejis are somehow less
intelligent or
inventive but because that's seriously the best anyone can do in these places without modern technology and agricultural techniques.
The story is much the same in historical Somalia. In fact, Somalis' overall similarity to Khaleejis is pretty remarkable. The same dynamic is historically found with a mostly pastoral nomadic population wondering the countryside, a smaller agropastoral and settled farmer population in the few arable regions available and a small trader, sailor / settled urbanite community usually along the coast line settled on towns that are never quite as big as those in places like Egypt because they simply lack the agricultural base to match something like that but even so the largest towns like Saylac, Berbera, Xamar and whatnot were not anything to scoff at when they were at their height. Somalis very easily adopted the architectural influences of outsiders and seemingly added their own touch to these towns and settled and maintained them throughout their histories. Basically, humans aren't very different at all when given the same conditions.
By your genius logic Mongols must be inferior to Somalis and Khaleejis given their stark lack of historical urbanism once you ignore their short stint as an imperial power. Even their historical capital Karakorum was mostly a collection of
Gers. But of course this has nothing to do with Mongols not being "inventive" or "smart" or incapable of urbanism and everything to do with the fact that their part of the steppe is an arid hellhole with not even a coastline to speak of. Most Mongols have historically lived the only lifestyle that really made sense for where they are.
As for Madows, I would not call them "un-inventive" or "un-creative" or whatever by a long stretch. Those niggas discovered agriculture, animal domestication, metallurgy and prot-writing all by themselves in West-Africa which is more than can be said for Northern Europeans who had to have nearly all of that exported to them from the Middle-East by way of proxy through Southern Europe. The only thing I'm facing here is an annoying and quite pathetic self-hater. You will never amount to anything in life with such a pathetic mindset, man. Thinking you are inherently inferior to other people or some shit. Disgusting.