Burton had his biases and wasn't very fond of the more insular clans that were unfriendly to him.
Somalis are interesting. However, they are not some monolith and not all subscribe to some notion of ethnic brotherhood. They could be friendly one minute and go rogue the next due to some disagreement. I've been online long enough to see the swinging pendulum between clans from ally to adversary (often from a disagreement followed by a series of emotionally fueled ad hominins exchanged). As far as information goes quite a bit is available online for public consumption but some information is gated and within the clan. I find nothing wrong with that.
From what I remember from the book, I think it was the Cisse compared to the Gadabursi who had the most unflattering portrayal. I can’t remember anything about the Gadabursi he said that indicated any dislike. The Issa where shown to look positively feral.
I know we’re not a monolith which was what I was telling one poster. I was saying that we weren’t united. But, I’m sure we all saw each other as similar and being off the same heritage due to language and culture. But fighting, having our own separate leaderships ect was the norm it seems and I’m not surprised. Even till this day, there isn’t much of an ethnic brotherhood, as recent events have shown. Personally, I think it’s rather pathetic as the clans that hate each other the most amongst Somalis tend to be the heavily related with high intermarriages. Effectively, people are hating on the clans of their mothers and grandmothers. Many clans especially the ones that bordered each other intermarried at alarming rates but they’d be fighting each other the most.
As for you point about information being guarded, clans have a right to do that although it doesn’t make sense to me in the slightest, but things don’t have to make sense.
Also, are Samaroons Dir and there therefore share the same clan as Cisse? Aren’t you heavily related to them? It similarly to let’s say MJ and Dhulbahante?