Yhh but even the aboriginals before the western influence, they have a very archaic look, maybe its my own biases, i like a gracile face tbh
View attachment 219264
Take him for example, he has an extremely archaic morphology, strong brow ridge, deep infra glabellar notch, sloped forehead, prognathism etc...
these are all archaic traits commonly found in chimps, paedormophism has been occuring for at least 100's of thousands of years, when you look at an infant chimp, they don't have those features, they don't have prognathism, or a sloped forehead etc... but they develop them over a certain period of time, humans are different as we largely retain our child-like form, compare:
This black lady's morphology is objectively closer to a chimp than the white lady. I think this is the main reason she is so ugly tbh, she doesn't look human.
This isn't a racial thing btw, but these 2 are a good example.
Yh your right, I think they've had a different evolutionary history tbh
Yh child-like faces are said to "disarm" people, as in, people are less likely to harm them, so it makes sense how it would have been even more intensely selected for in recent years when people were trying to develop functioning societies.
A lot of people are suprised by this, but paedormorphism is what caused projected chins, hominins like neanderthals had receded chins, but paedorphism which causes growth retardation of the lower jaws results in the chin sticking out
Horn Africans are among the most paedormorphic in the world, except for chins. We lack brow ridges, prognathism, flat nasal bridges, sloped foreheads, only thing we lack is proper chin morphology.
These 2 are good examples of people with extremely paedormorphic skulls whilst having good development