Wait what? You were religious but not anymore?
Can you elaborate please, and if you don't feel comfortable sharing it on here then send me a message, there's no judgement on my part I'm just curious.
Eh f*ck it, no one knows me irl, I'll explain.
Couple of disclaimers:
1. I believe in God. The universe didn't just happen. That's an absurdity.
2. My lack of faith isn't due to a disdain for it, but due to moral contradictions that are hard to reconcile with.
3. Science wasn't really a major player in my views on faith. Philosophy was.
Alright, time for a story folks. From middle school to high school, I was a religious kid. Not the kind that gets in your face, but the kind that was devout enough to notice. Friday prayer club in school. Dugsi on weekends. Shit like that. In my first year of university, I've begun to be more interested in philosophy as a topic. At this point, there was no real connection with philosophy and religion at the time.
By university, I began to examine Islam. Not because I had doubts, but because others had doubts, and I felt that examining the faith would lead me to building a stronger foundation to my faith. If that makes sense.
Scientifically, one can definitely still be a Muslim and accept scientific truths. At least it was easy for me. Evolution didn't waver my faith.
Ethics and Logic did. I'll break down the major things that, at least in my eye, don't make sense about the faith. If you got an adequate answer for them, by all means, shoot them up.
1. Destiny and free will.
Logically speaking, these things are a clear contradiction. There's no way both can exist in the same time. God in the faith makes a lot of points clear.
a. Our lives are predestined.
b. God's will is absolute.
c. All things are controlled by God. All is God's will.
Based on these points, that if you disagree with, means you disagree with the absoluteness of destiny, means that any responsibility or accountability for the sins of man cannot be sensible taken seriously. Why should their sins be counted, if they were destined to sin in the first place? They had free will and wanted to sin? Why was this the case? Because it was their destiny. You cannot have both free will and destiny. They are not compatible.
2. The Problem with Evil
Just note, that I will being using point 1 to strengthen point 2 here, and point 2 for point 3.
The problem of evil was a riddle proposed by the philosopher Epicurus. It goes like this.
God is all powerful, all knowing and all kind.
Based on these attributes, evil cannot exist.
If God is all powerful and all knowing, does He not care?
If God is all loving and all powerful, is He ignorant?
If God is only all loving and all knowing, is He not strong enough?
If God is all loving, all knowing and all powerful, then where does evil come from?
I myself had a solution for this. This world is a test. And that evil is a necessity for that test, to prove that man is worthy of heaven. 2 major problems with this.
a. Because we established that free will and destiny are not compatible, then the test in and of itself is a farce. The result of the test was determined before the person was born. What kind of test is that? How can one even call that a test? Since such a test was useless from its inception, the fact that evil still remains becomes a major issue.
b. This does not account for natural evils. Humans born deformed. Natural disasters. Diseases. Accidents. Etc. How does one account for evils that have nothing to do with testing a man's moral worth for heaven? Why do these things occur? So that man accepts God's will absolutely? Then why is it done unfairly? Prophet Job was a testament for this. But God made Job, and written his story before he was born. As such, the entire result was already made up by God before hand. Such an example then cannot be taken seriously by any sane person.
3. The Problem with Hell
This is the most extreme point. Not for the faint of heart. I'm being serious for once.
Hell and God, by the definition of His character, cannot coexist.
Let us begin by defining Hell, so no one confused by the points I'll make below.
Hell: A world created by God as a punishment for sinners. How long one is punished will vary.
Some are punished for all eternity.
It is the italicized sentence in the definition that's the major problem. Here are a list:
a. God is defined as perfectly just and fair, and yet punishes man for eternity when they lived a finite life. Eventually, there will come a point where man's punishment exceeds his life on Earth. How can one justify this?
b. God had a man's life predestined, and yet deems it just to punish said man for all eternity.
c. The punishment of Hell is more severe than anything man can do in this world. By this clear understanding, the punishment clearly does not fit the crime.
d. The reasons for man's punishment by Hell seem more fear based, then morally based. A man of a different faith will go to Hell for having a different faith. Why? On what moral grounds can one justify this? Why would God do this? Who benefits by this? Of course, the leaders of the faith.
e. Other faiths have Hell, under the same exact conditions, Christianity for example. What is a man to do in this situation? Flip a coin? Get their fingers crossed that they made the right choice of Hell? This is absurd.
And there ya go. Those are the reasons as to why I'm not religious anymore. I'm of course open to people's answers for these. I will take them seriously, and will not attack anyone who wants to actually try and answer them. I will simply attack the points if needed. Nothing more.