UAE Opens Shirk Temple

Celery

Vasodilator
VIP
why are you ducking the question?

does international law supersede the shariah?

or do you recognize that sovereignty belongs to Allah and that no other law can supersede the shariah?
They’re not always mutually exclusive. And both are mandmade and subject to scrutiny.
 

Yami

4th Emir of the Akh Right Movement
Muslims calcaling about this with the thousands of musjid’s built in tolerate gaal lands is pretty funny
 

angelplan

Staff Member
2020 CHESS CHAMP
BORAMA, AWDAL
Live and let live folks. People have a right to practice their religion in peace. Remember Islam teaches to each their own religions.
 

angelplan

Staff Member
2020 CHESS CHAMP
BORAMA, AWDAL
Muslims calcaling about this with the thousands of musjid’s built in tolerate gaal lands is pretty funny
Well said Yami. If you have the correct and complete religion that is beautiful Islam you need not worry what others worship. Freedom of religion is for everyone.
 

Celery

Vasodilator
VIP
yes, the shariah is revealed and not man-made. that is correct.
Play with words when you lose. Extremist nut jobs like yourself don’t have a monopoly on the correct way to practice Islam. There are numerous Islamic jurists who have differing opinions on everything and all of them can be questioned.
 
Play with words when you lose. Extremist nut jobs like yourself don’t have a monopoly on the correct way to practice Islam. There are numerous Islamic jurists who have differing opinions on everything and all of them can be questioned.
There is a monopoly on how to practice Islam, and that is simply the way of the Sunnah. The Islamic jurists don't disagree on everything -- and even if they follow strict, rich traditions -- no jurist makes willy-nilly personal takes (Islamic law is way more comprehensive and coherent than any other legal system). Nor are they wide-ranging interpretive discrepancies, as you ridiculously make it seem. They differ in minor nuances but not fundamental practices. You're the extremist for invoking such a dramatic word against a reasonable standard statement.

Imagine calling a Muslim an extremist and getting emotional over the rejection of having polytheistic temples in Islamic countries. Are you even a Muslim?
 

Celery

Vasodilator
VIP
There is a monopoly on how to practice Islam, and that is simply the way of the Sunnah. The Islamic jurists don't disagree on everything -- and even if they follow strict, rich traditions -- no jurist makes willy-nilly personal takes (Islamic law is way more comprehensive and coherent than any other legal system). Nor are they wide-ranging interpretive discrepancies, as you ridiculously make it seem. They differ in minor nuances but not fundamental practices. You're the extremist for invoking such a dramatic word against a reasonable standard statement.

Imagine calling a Muslim an extremist and getting emotional over the rejection of having polytheistic temples in Islamic countries. Are you even a Muslim?
You know the deen way better than the rulers of this Muslim country? Why did they do this if it means it goes against Islam and they’ll go to hell for it? Let me guess it’s because they are corrupt and unislamic and you’re the true Muslim. You are extremist. Period.
 

Celery

Vasodilator
VIP
There is a monopoly on how to practice Islam, and that is simply the way of the Sunnah. The Islamic jurists don't disagree on everything -- and even if they follow strict, rich traditions -- no jurist makes willy-nilly personal takes (Islamic law is way more comprehensive and coherent than any other legal system). Nor are they wide-ranging interpretive discrepancies, as you ridiculously make it seem. They differ in minor nuances but not fundamental practices. You're the extremist for invoking such a dramatic word against a reasonable standard statement.

Imagine calling a Muslim an extremist and getting emotional over the rejection of having polytheistic temples in Islamic countries. Are you even a Muslim?
Nuclear option eh
 
You either go down the terror path or the civilized path taken by the UAE. India is right to crack down on Islamic terrorists like yourself. Every nation has a right to maintain security and peace. If a group of intolerant extremist Muslims demand everything, you don’t have to abide by their rules.

We do not take advice from Kafirs such as yourself.

Muslims are only getting more religious so you will only see Islam grow and strengthen the coming years. So you and your ilk can watch and seethe as the Islam you call terror grows on strength and the liberalism you call civilization continues its decline.
 
I’m Muslim. What religion are the rulers of UAE? You also wonder that?

You are not a Muslim. You are here calling Islam terror and secularism civilization.

Go spend some time learning about Islam instead of spewing nonsense here.
 
Sharia is not what you think. It’s a set of laws made by people using the Quran and sunnah as sources. People are not perfect. There can be things they leave out etc

You sound like you know nothing at all about Islam and in fact come from a Christian background.

The shariah has clear laws that are agreed upon and you have gone against them several times clearly in this thread. International law means nothing at all. It is useless and colonial, even those that created it do not abide by it, look at Palestine and the genocide.

To Muslims “international law” means nothing it is in fact designed to undermine Islam and now the whole world can see how useless it is.

The Shariah of Allah swt is the only law.
 
Top