That’s terrorist mindset. Won’t workout well in the long run. Especially since Muslims are the weakest and most fragile group.
following our own religion rather than caring what non-Muslims think is terrorist mindset??? obviously that is not true.
That’s terrorist mindset. Won’t workout well in the long run. Especially since Muslims are the weakest and most fragile group.
It would actually make sense if they did ban mosques that spawn these terrorists. Switzerland did actually ban signs of jihadist conquest such as minarets.
Demanding governments have discriminatory policies is terroristicfollowing our own religion rather than caring what non-Muslims think is terrorist mindset??? obviously that is not true.
I’m Muslim. What religion are the rulers of UAE? You also wonder that?I seriously wonder what religion you are or whether you have a religion
I’m Muslim. What religion are the rulers of UAE? You also wonder that?
Demanding governments have discriminatory policies is terroristic
They’re perfectly Muslim. They say the shahada, they pray five times per day, fast, give plenty of zakkah and make pilgrimage. There’s no sixth pillar that says kill anyone who doesn’t do any of these things.I don't say they are non Muslim but yes I seriously question whether that government is Muslim. And it's pretty reasonable to have doubts about it. And honestly.... opening shirk temples... the abrahamic house and now this hindu temple..... that is pretty serious stuff.
Who are “innocent” people in your view?Saying that governments should follow well-established rules of the shariah.... that is not what irhab is, irhab is when people attack innocent people. That is the actual definition of irhab. Saying Muslim governments... especially in the Arabian peninsula, should not open Hindu temples is not irhab. Saying that's irhab must be similar to the mindset of Chinese officials who imprison Uyghurs for having beards.
Who are “innocent” people in your view?
They’re perfectly Muslim. They say the shahada, they pray five times per day, fast, give plenty of zakkah and make pilgrimage. There’s no sixth pillar that says kill anyone who doesn’t do any of these things.
He said if there are treaties in place, churches can remain. The whole world is built on treaties. There are centuries old treaties and modern treaties. All international conventions, UN conventions etc count as treaties that Muslim countries must abide by.btw, for those defending this... it's very clear that this is haraam.
He said if there are treaties in place, churches can remain. The whole world is built on treaties.
All international conventions, UN conventions etc count as treaties that Muslim countries must abide by.
Muslims live across the world. The whole world is “Muslim lands”. There are international treaties that allow Muslims and non Muslims to build temples and mosques.What... he's saying as you very well know that this is if the church is already there. The Hindu temple was not already there.
Muslims live across the world. The whole world is “Muslim lands”. There are international treaties that allow Muslims and non Muslims to build temples and mosques.
The source for sharia law is the Quran and sunnah and it is put together by Islamic jurists. There are different kinds of Islamic jurists and their work and rulings can be questioned.ah ok you added this part. do you believe UN law supersedes shariah?
The source for sharia law is the Quran and sunnah and it is put together by Islamic jurists. There are different kinds of Islamic jurists and their work and rulings can be questioned.
Sharia is not what you think. It’s a set of laws made by people using the Quran and sunnah as sources. People are not perfect. There can be things they leave out etcno, Muslims- especially in Muslim countries- are not allowed to practice their religion by "international law". they are allowed by shariah. according to you, does international law supersede shariah?