How can you say they are not saxiix?
I don't believe they're sahih, first and foremost, there's a perfect example of a sahih hadith that goes against the prophet. The one that describes him as a slave trader, but how can the prophet have been a slave trader if he's iliterate?
Slave traders at the time were literate people.
There is also another sahih hadith that claims that the israelites were destroyed because their women wore hair extensions, ridiculous.
Furthermore, no matter what people say the hadith will never be comparable to the Quran and Sunnah, why is that? It's because they're not reliable. No matter the hadith show, what always remains true is the fact that they will never be authentic, why is that?
The sunnah is reliable because it's confirmed to be from the prophet. The Quran, not much to be said, is gods words, so ofc it would be reliable.
Conclusion, doesn't make sense for me to see the hadith as something important and reliable.