You have to be Quraysh not just bani hashim. You can be bani makhzum or bani ummaya as wellTo be the Caliph you have to be Banu Hashim. The Ottoman were only an empire, they were never a Caliphate.
You have to be Quraysh not just bani hashim. You can be bani makhzum or bani ummaya as wellTo be the Caliph you have to be Banu Hashim. The Ottoman were only an empire, they were never a Caliphate.
Lol typical coper. There is no ummah without the Arabs, no Islamic golden age, no caliphate nothing. Show respect baguetteArabist use this argument all the time.
As far as i know, it's only a recommendation. If there is a good leader who's of a different tribe and another good leader who's of Banu Hashim. It's better to chose the one of the prophet's tribe to be the successor/caliph.
Likewise, if a good leader is of a different tribe and the bad leader challenging his claim is a bad leader of Banu Hashim. It is better to chose the good leader as caliph even if he isn't of the prophet's tribe.
But as far as I'm concerned, Arabs did jack shit other than fight each other and get ruled by Turkic and Persians. Had the Ottomans not established an Islamic state over the reigon the Arabs would've gotten colonised by Portuguese and later other Europeans 400 years ago. Therefore the Ottomans were absolutely a caliphate, they led the Islamic world and carried it into the 20th century before it's collapse.
To be the Caliph you have to be Banu Hashim. The Ottoman were only an empire, they were never a Caliphate.
I included Hassan Sheikh who is the ruler of Somalia, Somalians should obey him and refrain from criticizing him. I dont like him at all but this is simply the caseThat is not a system no sane individual wants to be part of or should give a f*ck about. It is purely tribal without qualification.. You and others who are tribalist Arab bigots or wanna be Arabs really have strange religion.
I don;t care about Banu Hashim. I am neither Arab nor believe in rewarding a human being with a position of responsibility unless they deserve it.
The same goes for the guy who opened this topic Al-Adnani, The men he mentioned are not rulers for Somalis, so this topic is of zero value to Somalis.
This exact logic applies to Siad Barre lol, and no he wasn't a Kaffir and u can see him doing Hajj last couple of yearsThen you have to be patient and trust in Allah, rebelling is usually a cause for fitnah. I will give you an example, in the Arab spring, the Yemenis assassinated president Ali Abdullah Saleh in frustration with his corrupt rule. However, this assassination only brought more problems. Now Yemen is a fragmented state divided among the rule of several different rebels and the people are suffering even more than before. They should have exacted patience
Go to Saudia and get bent over by a fat Khaleeji.Lol typical coper. There is no ummah without the Arabs, no Islamic golden age, no caliphate nothing. Show respect baguette
Siad committed Kufr more than once during his rule. Just lookThis exact logic applies to Siad Barre lol, and no he wasn't a Kaffir and u can see him doing Hajj last couple of years
Every mislead Muslim leader is called Kaafir by the rebellious people to cause more fitna
Nobody said the persians and turks did not contribute to islam, but they cannot be compared in the same light as the Arabs simply based on lineage alone.Go to Saudia and get bent over by a fat Khaleeji.
There is no Islamic golden age without Persians. Name all the great minds of the age and most will be from Iran.
The caliphate was run by Persian beurocracts who had the knowledge of statecraft. The Arabs didn't even know how to mint coins before the Persians taught them. Early caliphate used Greek byzantine coins with the cross on them.
I do not hate Arabs I have respect for them as I respect other ethnics. But my main point in this thread is do not worship a people who are really not that exceptional.
My hatred is towards these Arab nationalists who in the past decades tried to re write history and use the quran out of context to attack Turks and Persians who led the Islamic world also. This is because Arabs were weak and in the backseat for the past centuries and did little more than fight among themselves.
Arab nationalists hate that and want to take out of context quotes from the quran and their own silly view on Ottomans and such to try portray Arabs as some 'natural leaders' of the Islamic world. They have to cook up this silly idea to medicate their insane cope because Arabs can not compete with the organisation and state building of the Turks and Persians who by vitrue of their own advances were able to lead the region.
Those are all rumours, Said Barre according to all those close to him died as a Muslim so u sinning by saying he's a kafirSiad committed Kufr more than once during his rule. Just look
The jealousy oozing from this post is insane wallahGo to Saudia and get bent over by a fat Khaleeji.
There is no Islamic golden age without Persians. Name all the great minds of the age and most will be from Iran.
The caliphate was run by Persian beurocracts who had the knowledge of statecraft. The Arabs didn't even know how to mint coins before the Persians taught them. Early caliphate used Greek byzantine coins with the cross on them.
I do not hate Arabs I have respect for them as I respect other ethnics. But my main point in this thread is do not worship a people who are really not that exceptional.
My hatred is towards these Arab nationalists who in the past decades tried to re write history and use the quran out of context to attack Turks and Persians who led the Islamic world also. This is because Arabs were weak and in the backseat for the past centuries and did little more than fight among themselves.
Arab nationalists hate that and want to take out of context quotes from the quran and their own silly view on Ottomans and such to try portray Arabs as some 'natural leaders' of the Islamic world. They have to cook up this silly idea to medicate their insane cope because Arabs can not compete with the organisation and state building of the Turks and Persians who by vitrue of their own advances were able to lead the region.
Listen to this man, how he rejects the words of Allah on recording. He is a Muslim according to you, is this a hill you are willing to die on? A Muslim who defends kufr of another is a kafir as well just so you knowThose are all rumours, Said Barre according to all those close to him died as a Muslim so u sinning by saying he's a kafir
is MBS a Kaafir now also when he permitting everything, how about Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi who were similar to Barre?
They can, Arabs had their day in the sun, Turks and Persians had their day in the sun also. Now who will lead Islam is up for debate.Nobody said the persians and turks did not contribute to islam, but they cannot be compared in the same light as the Arabs simply based on lineage alone.
No debate who gonna lead Islam, Mahdi the last global leader before ISA is from Prophets lineage and Banu Hashim alsoThey can, Arabs had their day in the sun, Turks and Persians had their day in the sun also. Now who will lead Islam is up for debate.
And saying one people is superior to another based on lineage alone..
I'd like to leave you with the Prophet's last sermon.
"All mankind is from Adam and Eve. An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; a white has no superiority over a black, nor does a black have any superiority over a white except by piety and good action."
They can, Arabs had their day in the sun, Turks and Persians had their day in the sun also. Now who will lead Islam is up for debate.
And saying one people is superior to another based on lineage alone..
I'd like to leave you with the Prophet's last sermon.
"All mankind is from Adam and Eve. An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; a white has no superiority over a black, nor does a black have any superiority over a white except by piety and good action."
This is what I mentioned in my previous post sxb. It's all a part of their arabism agenda. To try make Arabs seem as some natural leader of the Arab world to cope with the past millenia of turkic-persian leadership of the region.This Munaafaq doesn't care about what Prophet Mohamed said unless it is inline with his bigotry. Him and other claimants of Islam who push the same argument has zero Faith. Al-Adnani is in denial of Allah's stated equality among men and the prophet declarations that no Arab is superior to a non-Arab.
He claims to be a muslim but we all know people can claim all they want. The proof is in the statements people make. Siyad Barre is more of a muslim than this Al-Adnani is to me.
I included Hassan Sheikh who is the ruler of Somalia, Somalians should obey him and refrain from criticizing him. I dont like him at all but this is simply the case
Why did you remove your iconic pfp I thought you were a new userGet busy with a more useful endevour - Fix your faith. It is broken based on your pre-islamic jahiliyah statements.
This is you right now...Damn we really have obedient slaves on this website @Scipio Africanus @Al Adnani obedient fucking little slaves I will buy you from your Arab scums owners do not worry both of you $20.25 each twenty dollars and twenty five cents plus tax. I will be much harsher in punishment though bc I like disobedient slaves and not wide eyes obedient ones.