The Bible is an Interesting book..

[niggaibnh]

The extra books in the Ethiopian Orthodox Bible are still considered legitimate by other churches but they are used in the same context that Hadiths are in Islam

Comparing hadiths to a holy book says a lot tbh

 

[seldiboy]

I’m talking about the Edited parts. Of course some parts of it aka the Genesis is mostly correct.

The Bible has been translated. It’s not been ‘edited’

 

[seldiboy]

Comparing hadiths to a holy book says a lot tbh

They’re part of something called the Apocrypha. They’re aren’t part of the ‘Bible proper’ necessarily but they are still considered canon. It’s hard to explain to someone who isn’t versed in Orthodoxy

 

[Awad]

They’re part of something called the Apocrypha. They’re aren’t part of the ‘Bible proper’ necessarily but they are still considered canon. It’s hard to explain to someone who isn’t versed in Orthodoxy

Can you read ge'ez? Is the kebra nagast a holy book?

 

[seldiboy]

Can you read ge'ez? Is the kebra nagast a holy book?

I can’t understand Ge’ez but I can read the script. As far as I know the Kebra Nagast is not canon within the Bible. Sure maybe some of it is true but it isn’t a holy book

 

[Bundasliga]

The extra books in the Ethiopian Orthodox Bible are still considered legitimate by other churches but they are used in the same context that Hadiths are in Islam

If they are legitimate why dont they have it themselves?

The truth is there is no consens on what should be part of the bible or not.

 

[Erythrean]

@seldiboy. I’ve heard that the Ethiopian and Eritrean orthodox churches that the Book of Enoch seriously and as fact, is this true?

 

[seldiboy]

@seldiboy. I’ve heard that the Ethiopian and Eritrean orthodox churches that the Book of Enoch seriously and as fact, is this true?
View attachment 254152

Part of the Apocrypha. Not taken literally