you mean niqabI’m not gaal. I’m just against things like Al shabaab and hijab with face covering. Egypt has banned that too which means they oppose it. Are they gaal?
you mean niqabI’m not gaal. I’m just against things like Al shabaab and hijab with face covering. Egypt has banned that too which means they oppose it. Are they gaal?
No hijab too. People wear it more for comfort and a political protest rather than religious observance. In fact there’s no specific ruling on how to wear it. Many wear it as part of an anti social behaviour influenced by a victim mentality.you mean niqab
it’s a pretty basic part of Islam though how are you against it. Also your last sentence that makes no sense where did you get that from.No hijab too. People wear it more for comfort and a political protest rather than religious observance. In fact there’s no specific ruling on how to wear it.Many wear it as part of an anti social behaviour influenced by a victim mentality.
There’s no dress manual in the Quran. Men are supposed to lower their gaze, meaning don’t jerk off to every woman. And women are not supposed to use vibrators in public and simply be modest. The actual modern hijab, and even worse the niqab are all modern political inventions. Group think and peer pressure, along with political Islam is why hijab is worn the way it is.it’s a pretty basic part of Islam though how are you against it
The Quran talks about Khimar and covering up actually.Niqab is cultural and facial veiling has been a thing in numerous different cultures Islam has nothing to do with Niqabs.You as a Muslim shouldn’t be against women choosing to coverThere’s no dress manual in the Quran. Men are supposed to lower their gaze, meaning don’t jerk off to every woman. And women are not supposed to use vibrators in public and simply be modest. The actual modern hijab, and even worse the niqab are all modern political inventions. Group think and peer pressure, along with political Islam is why hijab is worn the way it is.
You have been seen on numerous threads openly mocking Islam. If you are a kafir, say so. This is an anonymous forum.I’m not gaal. I’m just against things like Al shabaab and hijab with face covering. Egypt has banned that too which means they oppose it. Are they gaal?
If you lack intellectual capability to engage and defeat my points, no need to call me names.
The Quran explicitly states that women need to cover their bodies except for “that which is apparent” (meaning face, hands). The overwhelming consensus of scholars all state that women need to cover everything except at most their face and hands.There’s no dress manual in the Quran. Men are supposed to lower their gaze, meaning don’t jerk off to every woman. And women are not supposed to use vibrators in public and simply be modest. The actual modern hijab, and even worse the niqab are all modern political inventions. Group think and peer pressure, along with political Islam is why hijab is worn the way it is.
That which is apparent includes hair. The face and hands interpretation is wrong. Are you telling me people can’t be wrong?You have been seen on numerous threads openly mocking Islam. If you are a kafir, say so. This is an anonymous forum.
How can I engage with an open liar? You are obviously not serious, if you were serious; you would be honest about your religious views.
The Quran explicitly states that women need to cover their bodies except for “that which is apparent” (meaning face, hands). The overwhelming consensus of scholars all state that women need to cover everything except at most their face and hands.
Stick to writing fake stories on NSFW nigga, you are out of your depth here.![]()
According to whom? Are you some big shiekh who studied in Madina this whole time? Or are you just being a divisive prick? You are a deviant who shouldn't be considered when talking about deen.That which is apparent includes hair. The face and hands interpretation is wrong. Are you telling me people can’t be wrong?
Yes I studied the deen for a long long time. And I have my conclusions just like many others before me. I’m under no obligation to be agreeable and friendly to everyone’s feelings.According to whom? Are you some big shiekh who studied in Madina this whole time? Or are you just being a divisive prick? You are a deviant who shouldn't be considered when talking about deen.
View attachment 320628View attachment 320629View attachment 320630
Watchu mean by that nigga, I shouldve known day 1 when your profile picture was celery That you were not okayGo make afur and stop being childish. You can disagree without going all triggered
A degree in r/ islam MashAllah!Yes I studied the deen for a long long time. And I have my conclusions just like many others before me. I’m under no obligation to be agreeable and friendly to everyone’s feelings.
Modern interpretations of Islam are designed to suit political ends by the interpreters. It’s totally ok to question or even refute someone’s interpretation.
I’ve done more studying than you. My sources are not just books and internet research. I’ve spent my hours with knowledgeable sheikhs in different cities.A degree in r/ islam MashAllah!
Whatever you say Mister CeleryI’ve done more studying than you. My sources are not just books and internet research. I’ve spent my hours with knowledgeable sheikhs in different cities.
My opinions are based on what I learned.
None of the controversial things I said on this forum lack basis in the Quran or Hadith. Except the satirical stuffWhatever you say Mister Celery
"That which is apparent" means that which is hard to cover. According to most scholars this means the face and hands since it is hard to cover those areas. Some scholars though are of the opinion that covering the face is obligatory as well. Every scholar however agrees that the hair is not included in this exception because it is not physically hard for a woman to cover her hair.That which is apparent includes hair. The face and hands interpretation is wrong.
Hmm who's interpretation should I value more, the consensus of Islamic scholars over 1400 years or the opinion of one gaalo troll on SSpot? Hmm very tough choice.Are you telling me people can’t be wrong?
Regardless of who’s interpretation you value, they are still just interpretations. Both interpretations are influenced by underlying beliefs and ideas."That which is apparent" means that which is hard to cover. According to most scholars this means the face and hands since it is hard to cover those areas. Some scholars though are of the opinion that covering the face is obligatory as well. Every scholar however agrees that the hair is not included in this exception because it is not physically hard for a woman to cover her hair.
Hmm who's interpretation should I value more, the consensus of Islamic scholars over 1400 years or the opinion of one gaalo troll on SSpot? Hmm very tough choice.![]()
What does it have to do with?Erm… the reason hellfire will be majority women has nothing to do with “things [getting] out of hand” due to education.
What a retard...Regardless of who’s interpretation you value, they are still just interpretations. Both interpretations are influenced by underlying beliefs and ideas.
Shouldn’t you use your own brain and think for yourself? Islamic scholars are not closer to Allah or holy
he didn’t know hijab was fard until @Mudug_gyal corrected himAccording to whom? Are you some big shiekh who studied in Madina this whole time? Or are you just being a divisive prick? You are a deviant who shouldn't be considered when talking about deen.
View attachment 320628View attachment 320629View attachment 320630