Somebody must have stalked me because this is so true

Status
Not open for further replies.
because being an edgy contrarian is better than accepting information

Powell-Science-Pie-Chart.png


but its obviously a conspiracy tho
This climate change shit has been happening throughout the history of this planet, in one point in history it cools down and in another point it heats up, 93% of carbon emissions come from soil and water that's a fact. That graph u provided is pointless, of course majority of ppl believe the globe is warming up, the problem is these ppl believe that humans are the main contributers which is FAKE, humans contribute almost little to nothing on the world's rising temperature,

There's nothing we humans can do to stop this warming. Only way to stop this if we pass laws restricting soil to stop producing carbon and tell water to stop evaporating :siilaanyolaugh:
 

Tramo

Nine kitaabs on a bookshelf
This climate change shit has been happening throughout the history of this planet, in one point in history it cools down and in another point it heats up, 93% of carbon emissions come from soil and water that's a fact. That graph u provided is pointless, of course majority of ppl believe the globe is warming up, the problem is these ppl believe that humans are the main contributers which is FAKE, humans contribute almost little to nothing on the world's rising temperature,

There's nothing we humans can do to stop this warming. Only way to stop this if we pass laws restricting soil to stop producing carbon and tell water to stop evaporating :siilaanyolaugh:
how about u read what the graph actually says yeah

i dont get ur point about 93% of carbon emissions coming from soil and water, what is that supposed to prove? it's not the proportion of CO2 emissions that are the problems, but the raw amount :draketf:

but human contribution has little to do with the rising temperature, word? u sure about that or are u just 'being skeptical'? forget about fossil fuel burning, are u saying that deforestation hasn't led to an increase in co2? we cut down trees that absorb co2 to make way for roads, and u gonna sit here with a straight face and say we're not contributing? :lol:

even fossil fuels have been proven to contribute, u just have to look at the C14 isotope composition in the atmosphere. basically fossil fuels are millions of years old and C14 disappears to untraceable levels after about 50k years which means that fossil fuels being much older than 50,000 years old, should be devoid of C14. so, if we were to hypothesize for argument's sake now that we humans have added extra carbon from ancient fossil fuels into the atmosphere, the proportion of C14 to the other isotopes should be lowered. and that's exactly what has been found

but forget all this science bullshit, if u really believe there's this global, 200 year conspiracy among scientists to lie to us about the earth getting warmer wax baa kaa si ah sxb. occam's razor my dude, ha is wareerin
 
but forget all this science bullshit, if u really believe there's this global, 200 year conspiracy among scientists to lie to us about the earth getting warmer wax baa kaa si ah sxb. occam's razor my dude, ha is wareerin
He doesn't. You're putting words in his mouth and using it to shut him down. Or you've simply misunderstood him.
 

Tramo

Nine kitaabs on a bookshelf
He doesn't. You're putting words in his mouth and using it to shut him down. Or you've simply misunderstood him.
he said it's a hoax, wait no a HOAX. so unless scientists have been colluding to pull the wool over our eyes since the 1800's, im not sure how else it could be a hoax? accidental hoax?
 
how about u read what the graph actually says yeah

i dont get ur point about 93% of carbon emissions coming from soil and water, what is that supposed to prove? it's not the proportion of CO2 emissions that are the problems, but the raw amount :draketf:

but human contribution has little to do with the rising temperature, word? u sure about that or are u just 'being skeptical'? forget about fossil fuel burning, are u saying that deforestation hasn't led to an increase in co2? we cut down trees that absorb co2 to make way for roads, and u gonna sit here with a straight face and say we're not contributing? :lol:

even fossil fuels have been proven to contribute, u just have to look at the C14 isotope composition in the atmosphere. basically fossil fuels are millions of years old and C14 disappears to untraceable levels after about 50k years which means that fossil fuels being much older than 50,000 years old, should be devoid of C14. so, if we were to hypothesize for argument's sake now that we humans have added extra carbon from ancient fossil fuels into the atmosphere, the proportion of C14 to the other isotopes should be lowered. and that's exactly what has been found

but forget all this science bullshit, if u really believe there's this global, 200 year conspiracy among scientists to lie to us about the earth getting warmer wax baa kaa si ah sxb. occam's razor my dude, ha is wareerin
Let's just say we stop deforestation and fossil fuels today. How are u gonna stop green house gas from water vapors? It's impossible sxb, give up on this "save the earth from humans" agenda, there's absolutely nothing we can do:siilaanyolaugh:
 

Radical

Certified CNC expert.
Ladies, could you please stop using Kim Kardashian photos as memes? She is equally as funny as Hiroshima
 

Tramo

Nine kitaabs on a bookshelf
Let's just say we stop deforestation and fossil fuels today. How are u gonna stop green house gas from water vapors? It's impossible sxb, give up on this "save the earth from humans" agenda, there's absolutely nothing we can do:siilaanyolaugh:
greenhouse gases aren't necessarily problematic, but an excess is

if we completely stopped deforestation and the burning of fossil fuels, the greenhouse effect would decrease and in turn so would the rate of global warming. what do u mean there's nothing we can do lmao. i think u mean we can't reverse the damage
 
greenhouse gases aren't necessarily problematic, but an excess is

if we completely stopped deforestation and the burning of fossil fuels, the greenhouse effect would decrease and in turn so would the rate of global warming. what do u mean there's nothing we can do lmao. i think u mean we can't reverse the damage
The greenhouse gas would only decrease by probably 5% ife we abandoned fossil fuels and stopped deforestation, but u know that's never gonna happen, the big problem is the water vapors, they have a huge role producing greenhouse gases, and it's impossible to stop it or reduce significantly
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending

Top