@Dalalos_ibn_Adali and me were discussing political parties and he claimed 'center left' is not about strong central authority when all socialists and communists were unitarian-strong central authority-top down governments be it hitler-mussolini-soviets, the hall-marks of 'strong central authority' lies with socialist and left wing and if your 'nationalist' promoting less federal rights, you are not right wing, just stop having 'fetish' with right wing when all u think it means is 'kkk and anti immigrant groups', when it's far from that.
Let me explain center left and center right. The 'center' is always about the structure of 'state organs' and if it's unitarian vs federal, since Somalia is purely 'federal' it's not about 'federal vs central' as that would cause full paradigm shift in comparison to how Somalia is, it's not about right vs left(unitarian vs federal).
Somalia is fully 'federal' there isn't a 'unitary' government and there is 'various governments', but that doesn't mean it's a full federalism of 'center right persuasion' which call for a 'loose central authority' where-as center left calls for 'stronger central authority'. If your nationalists and a federalist and prefer more 'centered' powerful federal government, you are 'center left'. If you prefer a government that is loose federalism with more state powers and less federal powers your 'center right'.
If your economic policy is socialist/capitalist is the second 'requirement' that defines 'center right and center left'. Since Somalia has a free market it's not about 'communism vs capitalism' since the market is 'free' it's about regulations and the more regulations in the economy and pro worker unionism means your 'center left' on economic policy, if your center right you want more business rights and less worker rights and less government interference. Then it comes down to 'social' policies like 'abortion, gay marriage, human rights, religious values' which define center left and center right with the center right about pro-life and no abortion-anti gay marriage-bible comes first not human rights. Then it's about immigration and refugee intake which define center left and center right.
So when Puntland establish parties it needs to make sure you tell us your political philosophy not just say 'federalist' since the nation is 'federal' but are you for federal member state powerful govt and weak or ceremonial central authority. Are u for capitalist or socialist market with regulations and do u care more for the workers to grow in wealth or businesses so we need an economic policy of your party. Then it's about social policies such as human rights, freedom vs 'shariah' because that is an important 'one' for me and I am definitely liberal on that matter. Then it's about yemeni/ethiopian immigration-IDPS matter which is going to be contested matter about their 'status' and 'rights' in our nation, So each party has to come with their manifesto on politics and cover at least the basic following;
1. Each party must declare their position on federalism if their for stronger state powers/duties/rights or federal govt powers/duties/rights
2. Each party must declare their economic position on capitalism-socialism as both are important and the establishment of workers union to bring our people out of abject poverty will require govt intervention on land prices subsidies, minimum wage laws, work conditions, health conditions of workers.
3. Each party must declare their position on freedom vs shariah, which is supreme and then human rights or 'shariah' as both are incompatible, it should create a center left or center paradigm this matter
4. Climate change policy is str8 forward as most people know it now but what is each party program going to do to end the 'desertification' of puntland,
5. Each party must declare their positions on social services
6. Each party must declare their 'security' policy be it regionally or federal
7. Each party must declare their education and health policies
Me and @farjano the absame economist had some tough debates around these matters, I am not sure if he has nudged on his economic positions as we discussed that a-lot but I also had some wild debates over freedom vs shariah, 'adam was free before shariah existed' was my argument and how can u have a religion without the establishment of freedom first as the 'law'. This got real heated with 'murtad this and that' thrown out which is great, that is the whole point of party politics for things to get heated, clans to go separate voting booths, etc.
I am also an 'ardent' secularist so there is many left wing views I hold, in-fact outside strong 'state rights over federal authority' and my views on 'economic policies being grafted towards creating a middle class thru govt regulations and unions'
No joke I am liberal in every policy field and nothing wrong with being liberal. I am not 'liberal' on 'security' though. I think security is 'first' priority be it policing-intelligence-military, waxasi 'cayaar iyo siyasad' ima gaasho, the rest is my political leanings in economics-social policies-state rights over federal rights political philosophy is also a huge 'winning point' for me from the center right.
So if we had to tick of DR Osman leaning, it would be 80% liberal and 20% center right but that center 'right' 20% is heavily 'important' to me in comparison to 80% where i am liberal. Like Puntland security first and loose federalism is 'huge' policy weight for me. Secular-Human rights-Freedom being the 'law' is also major 'left wing policies I hold'. So the doctor will like most voters review what is important on the day of election between different parties in puntland platform.
So I am 80% liberal on most things but the 20% where I am center right it's helluva important matters like 'state rights, security' but so is secularism-freedom-human rights are just as equally heavy in my 'party politics'. Social services like hospitals-roads-sanitation-ports-airports-parks-etc are all 'developmental' it's great a party has policy around this but it won't be huge 'decider' like secularism-human rights-freedom-security first-and state rights are like 'engrained in my soul', the rest are things that I can negiotate on but not those ones.
Let me explain center left and center right. The 'center' is always about the structure of 'state organs' and if it's unitarian vs federal, since Somalia is purely 'federal' it's not about 'federal vs central' as that would cause full paradigm shift in comparison to how Somalia is, it's not about right vs left(unitarian vs federal).
Somalia is fully 'federal' there isn't a 'unitary' government and there is 'various governments', but that doesn't mean it's a full federalism of 'center right persuasion' which call for a 'loose central authority' where-as center left calls for 'stronger central authority'. If your nationalists and a federalist and prefer more 'centered' powerful federal government, you are 'center left'. If you prefer a government that is loose federalism with more state powers and less federal powers your 'center right'.
If your economic policy is socialist/capitalist is the second 'requirement' that defines 'center right and center left'. Since Somalia has a free market it's not about 'communism vs capitalism' since the market is 'free' it's about regulations and the more regulations in the economy and pro worker unionism means your 'center left' on economic policy, if your center right you want more business rights and less worker rights and less government interference. Then it comes down to 'social' policies like 'abortion, gay marriage, human rights, religious values' which define center left and center right with the center right about pro-life and no abortion-anti gay marriage-bible comes first not human rights. Then it's about immigration and refugee intake which define center left and center right.
So when Puntland establish parties it needs to make sure you tell us your political philosophy not just say 'federalist' since the nation is 'federal' but are you for federal member state powerful govt and weak or ceremonial central authority. Are u for capitalist or socialist market with regulations and do u care more for the workers to grow in wealth or businesses so we need an economic policy of your party. Then it's about social policies such as human rights, freedom vs 'shariah' because that is an important 'one' for me and I am definitely liberal on that matter. Then it's about yemeni/ethiopian immigration-IDPS matter which is going to be contested matter about their 'status' and 'rights' in our nation, So each party has to come with their manifesto on politics and cover at least the basic following;
1. Each party must declare their position on federalism if their for stronger state powers/duties/rights or federal govt powers/duties/rights
2. Each party must declare their economic position on capitalism-socialism as both are important and the establishment of workers union to bring our people out of abject poverty will require govt intervention on land prices subsidies, minimum wage laws, work conditions, health conditions of workers.
3. Each party must declare their position on freedom vs shariah, which is supreme and then human rights or 'shariah' as both are incompatible, it should create a center left or center paradigm this matter
4. Climate change policy is str8 forward as most people know it now but what is each party program going to do to end the 'desertification' of puntland,
5. Each party must declare their positions on social services
6. Each party must declare their 'security' policy be it regionally or federal
7. Each party must declare their education and health policies
Me and @farjano the absame economist had some tough debates around these matters, I am not sure if he has nudged on his economic positions as we discussed that a-lot but I also had some wild debates over freedom vs shariah, 'adam was free before shariah existed' was my argument and how can u have a religion without the establishment of freedom first as the 'law'. This got real heated with 'murtad this and that' thrown out which is great, that is the whole point of party politics for things to get heated, clans to go separate voting booths, etc.
I am also an 'ardent' secularist so there is many left wing views I hold, in-fact outside strong 'state rights over federal authority' and my views on 'economic policies being grafted towards creating a middle class thru govt regulations and unions'
No joke I am liberal in every policy field and nothing wrong with being liberal. I am not 'liberal' on 'security' though. I think security is 'first' priority be it policing-intelligence-military, waxasi 'cayaar iyo siyasad' ima gaasho, the rest is my political leanings in economics-social policies-state rights over federal rights political philosophy is also a huge 'winning point' for me from the center right.
So if we had to tick of DR Osman leaning, it would be 80% liberal and 20% center right but that center 'right' 20% is heavily 'important' to me in comparison to 80% where i am liberal. Like Puntland security first and loose federalism is 'huge' policy weight for me. Secular-Human rights-Freedom being the 'law' is also major 'left wing policies I hold'. So the doctor will like most voters review what is important on the day of election between different parties in puntland platform.
So I am 80% liberal on most things but the 20% where I am center right it's helluva important matters like 'state rights, security' but so is secularism-freedom-human rights are just as equally heavy in my 'party politics'. Social services like hospitals-roads-sanitation-ports-airports-parks-etc are all 'developmental' it's great a party has policy around this but it won't be huge 'decider' like secularism-human rights-freedom-security first-and state rights are like 'engrained in my soul', the rest are things that I can negiotate on but not those ones.