“So, I asked David over at Eurogenes to run Somalis as a mixture between South Sudanese people and Natufians in order to see how well the model would fit using a formal statistical method like qpAdm and he got some pretty surprising results overall:
Natufian + Sudanese (south):
Sudanese: 54%
Natufian: 46%
Neolithic Levant + Sudanese (south):
Sudanese: 54%
Neolithic Levant: 46%
Neolithic Levant + Chalcolithic Iran + Sudanese (south):
Sudanese: 55%
Neolithic Levant: 34%
Chalcolithic Iran: 11%
Now, what's going to surprise you is that the third model is the one that fits the best, and by a long shot when compared to the first model. Natufian + Sudanese (south) fits the worst (chisq: 26.256, tail prob: 0.09%, std. errors: 0.009), Neolithic Levant + Sudanese (south) fits much better (chisq: 7.593, tail prob: 47%, std. errors: 0.006) and Neolithic Levant + Chalcolithic Iran + Sudanese (south) fits even better (chisq: 4.975, tail prob: 66%, std. errors: 0.057).”
http://anthromadness.blogspot.com/2016/07/somali-qpadm-models-using-new-ancient.html?m=1
@Apollo what do u think of these results?
Natufian + Sudanese (south):
Sudanese: 54%
Natufian: 46%
Neolithic Levant + Sudanese (south):
Sudanese: 54%
Neolithic Levant: 46%
Neolithic Levant + Chalcolithic Iran + Sudanese (south):
Sudanese: 55%
Neolithic Levant: 34%
Chalcolithic Iran: 11%
Now, what's going to surprise you is that the third model is the one that fits the best, and by a long shot when compared to the first model. Natufian + Sudanese (south) fits the worst (chisq: 26.256, tail prob: 0.09%, std. errors: 0.009), Neolithic Levant + Sudanese (south) fits much better (chisq: 7.593, tail prob: 47%, std. errors: 0.006) and Neolithic Levant + Chalcolithic Iran + Sudanese (south) fits even better (chisq: 4.975, tail prob: 66%, std. errors: 0.057).”
http://anthromadness.blogspot.com/2016/07/somali-qpadm-models-using-new-ancient.html?m=1
@Apollo what do u think of these results?