That's not real life. In real life women are inferior and weakeryou wouldn't last 1 day in the army
Arrawelo should have smothered you when she had the chance.
Should WOMEN BE ALLOWED TO FIGHT IN THE ARMY
- Thread starter D2HUM8L31NE
- Start date
- Status
Arrawelo should have smothered you when she had the chance.
MadNomad
As i live and breathe
Not most wars, ALL wars. And yes, I’m against women fighting wars period.
Why should they risk their lives?
The only problem is the fact that women and children are often collateral in these wars. Other than that, if idiotic men want to slaughter each other, they should.
There's some queens in history known to have started wars, just saying.
Men are also collateral damage in wars you know. My late uncle didn't agree to any slaughtering when the Civil War happened.
Xooshdheere
how do i use this
Arrawelo should have smothered you when she had the chance.
>arawelo
she's just a book for little girls
I'll be sure to read this work. Thanks.
It's folklore. You should know. Why do you manage to be manipulated by 'inferior' beings?Who are the doqons that start wars over them? Diplomacy is the first line of defense in war and women practically pioneered it.
Yes, women can serve the army. I dont see nothing wrong in women serving their nation. They could be part of marine, airforce, ie. But not in a combat. They are liability there.
Study shows that, all male team perform far better than mixed gender teams, let alone all female team. Its widely discoved that the mobility and physical presence needed in combat is too much for female species. Ofcourse there are women who excel in those attributes but they are the exception not the rule.
But since the question was, can women serve the army, then yes, they can serve the army in a way thats suitable for them. I suppose being able to serve your nation is of greater relevance then how how to serve
Study shows that, all male team perform far better than mixed gender teams, let alone all female team. Its widely discoved that the mobility and physical presence needed in combat is too much for female species. Ofcourse there are women who excel in those attributes but they are the exception not the rule.
But since the question was, can women serve the army, then yes, they can serve the army in a way thats suitable for them. I suppose being able to serve your nation is of greater relevance then how how to serve
Gotcha, ur that sahersi user yaah? Always attacking men and shitNot most wars, ALL wars. And yes, I’m against women fighting wars period.
Why should they risk their lives?
The only problem is the fact that women and children are often collateral in these wars. Other than that, if idiotic men want to slaughter each other, they should.
@Coulombs law I found her, she couldn't resist her feminism rhetoric to attack men
arawelo 2.0
VIP
that emoiji.. really. typical violent maleGotcha, ur that sahersi user yaah? Always attacking men and shit
@Coulombs law I found her, she couldn't resist her feminism rhetoric to attack men
i just stated facts. there's no reason for women to die in your dick measuring contests aka wars.
that emoiji.. really. typical violent male
i just stated facts. there's no reason for women to die in your dick measuring contests aka wars.
ur jealousarawelo 2.0
VIP
Que
*Triggered*
One of the worst threads/pile of responses here.
EVERYONE should be allowed to serve; & NO ONE should be forced to serve.
You'll be the first they will look for on the battlefield when we invade Ethiopia
- Status
