It could work if every state/(clan) got equal representation plus were partly autonomous with a veto powerWhy banadir land. Why not just banadir?
Not ever state though. I can see a lot of them falling apart even more. Imagine chaos+power.
well in practice in a confederacy you are going your own seperate ways where you have your own leader/laws and control of your state, however their will be a group representation for all the states and all the states and clans send delegates for say dealing with other nations and more national things like trade agreementsNo ,we must go separate paths
P.s i know this message is confusing when it comes from someone named SomaliWadani
It could work if every state/(clan) got equal representation plus were partly autonomous with a veto power
well in practice in a confederacy you are going your own seperate ways where you have your own leader/laws and control of your state, however their will be a group representation for all the states and all the states and clans send delegates for say dealing with other nations and more national things like trade agreements
So what’s the difference between that and a confederacy in theory your separate but there are things we should be united in so each state and tribe should send delegatesNo we need to be fully independent from each other on every field like Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
However we can cooperate within the IGAD framework or forming The Somali Economical Nations to strengthen our trading ties.
Also on military we must be independent too without cooperation.
Let say for example: Xabashis attack one of the independent Somali State. Other Somali States must not help them.
So what’s the difference between that and a confederacy in theory your separate but there are things we should be united in so each state and tribe should send delegates
It could work if every state/(clan) got equal representation plus were partly autonomous with a veto power
well in practice in a confederacy you are going your own seperate ways where you have your own leader/laws and control of your state, however their will be a group representation for all the states and all the states and clans send delegates for say dealing with other nations and more national things like trade agreements
In this case pl and sl will act as different countries anyways in fact it gives them more powers and legitimacyToo much mini states in that case. That would be a terrible country. But I’m all for somaliland and pLand to get theirs lol. Somalia is a sinking ship and must be abandoned
View attachment 70597 View attachment 70598
no point in holding anyone hostage
View attachment 70599
View attachment 70600
Why would you be against itHell no
HmmWhy would you be against it
You get the whole nation under one country like you always spew but the power resides in the states hands and they run the government not the other way around seems like a win win to me
Yeah that’s my point.In this case pl and sl will act as different countries anyways in fact it gives them more powers and legitimacy
Tbh it will drive competition between states to develope and some will be broke as a joke compared to othersA confederacy isn’t fun, I wanted to conquer @SomaliWadaniSoldier and whip him like the good old Hobyo days.
Tbh it will drive competition between states to develope and some will be broke as a joke compared to others
But Somalis are so crab in a bucket their idea of competition if they see another state doing better wouldn’t be to try and match them, instead they would send businessmen with bombs to try and destabilize themTbh it will drive competition between states to develope and some will be broke as a joke compared to others
Why banadir land. Why not just banadir?
Not ever state though. I can see a lot of them falling apart even more. Imagine chaos+power.