You're missing the point. All I am doing is pointing flaws in non salafi methodology while you can not point any flaws in salafism since it's basic Quran/Sunnah/first generation.
Wallah you're ignorant my friend look. Do you know what ijtihaad means? No one on earth is a completely independent mujtahid today, Allahu A'lam.
This is how I know you having even started studying basic fiqh yet! Salafis are required to interpret directly from the Quran and Sunnah which is VERY difficult or even impossible for 99% of the Scholars today!
The 4 Madhabs are based on the Qur'an and Sunnah saaxib! What else did you think they were based on? The scholars just had differences of opinion in trivial matters because the Sahaabah (RA) had differences of opinion, they sometimes have different methods of interpreting Qur'an and Sunnah (Hadith) which you will learn in Usul Al-Fiqh.
If I bring you the Qur'an and all the Kitabs of sunnah will you be able to deduce rulings and interpret them? The answer is no, you wouldn't, even if you study for 20+ years. Scholars can very rarely do that today nowadays, I'm talking 99% of them. So if you follow the interpretation and reasoning of a Scholar, that means you follow a madhab!
Madhab basically means methodology. Saaxib I would advice you to seek knowledge, start with tajweed and hifd of the Qur'an, basic fiqh and Arabic. Don't talk about matters that are beyond your level such as the Ijmaa of the Ulamaa.
If you do seek knowledge persistently and patiently in sha Allah one day you will understand the foolishness of what you're saying!