Hate to break it to you walaal as dangerous as muqdisho is, it isn't the most dangerousView attachment 92478
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.worldatlas.com/amp/articles/most-dangerous-cities-in-the-world.html
That is a bit different 'citizen crimes' and more similar to 'idealogical warfare' with military bases all over the capital like 20k amisom and 10k SNA, 1000 Danab proving it's not a capital city but an active warzone and God knows how many police they have on the payroll and none of all these security officers can barely 'secure' a territory(14 sq km) for it's government to function
I think your being very unfair comparing a stable nation with government and rule of law and your not comparing apples to apples here. Compare Baghdad to Mogadishu, it's similar with the whole worlds army present due to it's lawlessness. I don't see that for Mexico at all.
More excuses by SFG supporters who fail to answer one question. You spent millions of Somali donor money over 4 years(2016-2020) into your 'security' forces yet the city is no different to 2011.
Can u explain this 'financial' loss to the Somali people on TV and why are you still not declaring you have 'failed' and 'wasted' they're time? if we speak on data and statistics(collect the amount of attacks) in mogadishu, it's clear as day to all Somali 'lacagta magacooda lagu qaato' inusan waxba ka gaban shabab iyo amni darada magalada and therefore a 'new policy' is needed before 'donors' decide to pull out of Somalia as a 'wasted' investments because those nations taxpayers are fed up with they're money going to areas where there is no gains to be seen.
While @nomand @embarassing keep cheering nabad and noolal not knowing if we 'investigated' they're budget and number of years khayre/farmajo have been in office and the 'security outcomes' in Mogadishu, they will look wallahi stupid before the world and showing they're support is on pure tribe not 'accountability'.