When it was time to draw the borders of British SL Warsangeli drew it on their own, the British consulted the Suldaan.@Thegoodshepherd the monarchy in england signed a 'protection treaty' with warsangeli sultanates, they self-ruled their people, similar to majerten kingdom. The colonials had no local presence in either kingdom. The Isaaq treaty was different, they didn't have a kingdom and even if they did it would be eliminated like what happened to warsangeli sultan, becuz their can only be one king or queen of the land and that was Elizabeth.
Australia has a protection treaty with America, however Australia still has it's own self-rule. Protection treaty don't mean 'gumaysi'. MJ/Warsan are similar to Australia with it's own self rule and foreign protection treaty.
The British Somaliland- Italian Somalia border ceased to exist after the unification of Somalia in 1960. If Isaaqs want succession for their clan they have to draw new borders. Their aggression is unacceptable.This is a fact most Somalis do not know. It is also a powerful argument against the claims Isaaq are making to representing British Somaliland.
Both clans have historical claim to independence as they were active at the time colonialists came in.@Laagite MJ/Warsan have a historical claim to Italy and Britain, that our sultanate was 'forcebly' destroyed by the colonialist and we want our original agreements restored. SL willingly joined Somalia, we mj/warsan were 'forced' to by destruction(mj kingdom) and jailing of sultan of warsangeli.
It is true. Dhulbahante never signed any agreement with the British.
The British had no legal claim over the territory inhabited by Dhulbahante, other than that which was asserted by force after the defeat of Sayidka.
The clans that signed agreement with the British were:
The Dhulbahante were conquered by the British. They were never legally part of the protectorate.
- Issa
- Gadabursi
- HA
- HJ
- Garhajis
Warsangeli
While the Isaaq, Dir and Warsangeli were under the protectorate, the Dhulbhanate are actually a colonized people. This is a fact most Somalis do not know. It is also a powerful argument against the claims Isaaq are making to representing British Somaliland.
This is in part why the British had no qualms about dispossessing entire subclans of Dhulbahante of their livestock, they had no legal obligation to them. Even after 1920, the British did not bother to get the two Garaads to sign an agreement.
This is the only person I have ever seen make this interesting argument:
https://www.walwaal.com/facts-about-british-somaliland-history/
That is main problem we facing in Sool. Sanaag in 2019 said no more jeegaan and today they feel development in every aspect.@FBIsomalia the dhulbahante people need to uprise against their leaders and say either join hargeisa or garowe, no more eating two ways. They think their smart by eating both-ways, this only makes their district suffer becuz nothing will be allocated to them becuz it will be said 'it's disputed territory' and development partners will stay out.
So their leader might win and enjoy eating two ways but their locals and district suffer the 'disputed' status where no development partner will go. I know I would prefer my district develop rather then politicians pockets. The only way SSC will get development is to end the 'disputed' territory and join one region completely.
They are called punaniland for a reason all they can do so talk and calacaal. Abunch of pussies I swear.A grown man is holding back tears. I love it. Action speak loader than words rather than crying please attempt to capture back Lasanod.
Muse visited Tukaraq which is few stones away from Garowe a future town of Somaliland.
We was Darawiish, we where kings. buttt today I am a Isaac slave.
Free my nigga Harti who have been reduced to being keyboard warriors.
I am going to call your girl Ayaan Hirsi Ali to pray for you.
![]()