It’s a thing in Commonwealth countries.
In Australia, your career could end for saying anything about the ANZACs. This is despite noted WWI historians having legitimate criticisms.
Since I want to have a good career in policy, I ain’t saying anything.
Okay now I kinda understand.
Btw Australia and New Zealand (the Anzac) were involved in the campaign to weaken the Ottomans at Gallipoli , the Entente Powers , Britain, Russia and France.
I know that Australia was a penal colony under the British colony , men forcefully
drafted to fight their masters wars, it doesn't make much sense , they had casualties as a result of that.
The British manipulative and deceptive discarded their allies at the frontline and withdrawn from their objectives.
The way these men died is depressing , mostly from diseases than bullets.
26,000 casualties.
Now I wonder how many casualties of the African King Rifles and Indian colonial soldiers that fought in both world wars were documented these multi battalions have contributed to the Allied Powers and particularly we question what of the Somali men forcibly drafted from the docks of Berbera to fight against the ferocious Imperial Japanese Army in Burma I'm guessing that Black and Brown people were considered dispensable used as a last resort when things got out of the hand.
The Axis Powers were evil but Churchill and Truman weren't saints.
The more you unveil the real history the more you get to dislike these neo colonialists.