I am seeing the same pattern that other Nabar iyo Naxdin drones follow. Deflect, deflect, deflect. When ever the FGS's sugar daddy Qatar is brought up, they mention UAE, Saudi Arabia and anything else to distract from the elephant in the room.kickz said:As you have laid it out, there should have been an investigation.
But I am always skeptical about the facts, when you step back Geo politically. UAE, Saudia are aligned, while Turkey and Qatar are aligned. Also Saudis and UAE regularly buy media propaganda here in the US.
And I have never parroted any of those Wadani accounts attacking Puntland.
This isn't about Saudi Arabia, UAE, or Turkey. It's about Qatar and the FGS. Stay focused.
So if I am understanding you correctly, you are seriously suggesting that the New York Times, the most reputable news organization in the world, was paid by UAE and Saudi Arabia to slander Qatar?kickz said:Also Saudis and UAE regularly buy media propaganda here in the US.
How do you reconcile this with the fact that Qatar admitted that the audio was true? Did UAE and Saudi Arabia pay them to say that as well?
Interesting that you find the New York Times reliable now after questioning their journalistic integrity a year ago when they dared to post about your sugar daddy Qatar's admission to carrying out a bombing campaign in Bosaso (a city which the clan you claim hails from). Very interesting.
For anyone wondering, here's the post in question:
@embarassing gave him that good good akhi there's no getting thru to himInteresting that you find the New York Times reliable now after questioning their journalistic integrity a year ago when they dared to post about your sugar daddy Qatar's admission to carrying out a bombing campaign in Bosaso (a city which the clan you claim hails from). Very interesting.
For anyone wondering, here's the post in question: