And they say men are the logical gender.
I feel like i'm talking to intellectually deficient individuals. Where have I mentioned that calling them hoes is equivalent or the same as killing them?
Can you please highlight the relevant part. You'll get 5 points.
Well you are certainly far from logical.I normally dont go into psychoanalysis before i have a hefty amount of information from posts but i digress.
Firstly placing two complaints side by side in a sentence renders them equivalent in weight.That is to say stating :
"faraaxs walking thinking that killing women and calling them hos and slags is acceptable behaviour??"
renders killing women and calling them out on haraam behaviour in the same light.I do not have to explain this since you already knew the transferable connotative implication of your sentence.Instead you've said it so as to manipulate the mindset of the general reader, an emotional plea coupled with an irrational foreground often renders an argument in your favour.Luckily we can analyse your illogical arguments our whim.
You are , what we in the industry call, a
basic halimo (pardon my french). You engage in Machiavellian tactics to discredit our arguments.The problem is that you are attacking a logical argument emotionally. Whataboutism is a perfect attack in an emotional stage, it diverts the question to the questionnaire which allows the question to be ignored.Luckily due to the medium being written, we can analyse this at our pleasure.You are a
basic halimo since you are so overt in your attacks , a genius like me can see it immediately.
As any logical person can see your arguments all are not to seek truth but to claim women are free of guilt.Your mental gymnastics will work well since most men are innately inferior in emotional arguments, instead focusing rather on plain logic.This simply destroys their credence.
I will end off with this , you are not talking to "intellectually deficient individuals" rather you are suffering the
basic halimo s effect, a cousin of the dunning kruger effect.It renders the infected confused and dazed abut her position in the argument.It bolsters her Machiavellian attacks however rendering the logical side dormant. How sad.