Again, this exposes your naivety. She's his property. That nullifies any possible consent. Also, you are yet to provide any actual evidence in favour of your argument. The narration you quoted was a man having sex with another man's slave girl (in different riwayas). Of course he would be sentenced like that because she didn't belong to him. Come up with actual evidence.
When the Prophet (SAW) forbade mistreatment of slaves; that was a general rule.
There are 1000s of ways to mistreat someone. It’s not as if the Prophet (SAW) would mention every single one of them one by one. “No hitting”, “no scratching”, “no pushing”, etc.
There’s not a SINGLE narration were raping of slaves was turned a blind eye to; NOT A SINGLE ONE.
Rather, what’s evident is that not only is it forbidden, but there are consequences for raping a slave.
You are a liar and not a very good one at that. None of the riwaayas mention that the female was a servant of another man (concerning the narration regarding Umar ibn al-Khattab). Rather, that was a female that has been captured and was given to the individual in question, as a maidservant.
Abu al-Hussain bin al-Fadhl al-Qatan narrated from Abdullah bin Jaffar bin Darestweh from Yaqub bin Sufyan from al-Hassab bin Rabee from Abdullah bin al-Mubarak from Kahmas from Harun bin Al-Asam who said: Umar bin al-Khatab may Allah be pleased with him sent Khalid bin al-Walid in an army, hence Khalid sent Dharar bin al-Auwzwar in a squadron and they invaded a district belonging to the tribe of Bani Asad. They then captured a pretty bride, Dharar liked her hence he asked his companions to grant her to him and they did so. He then had sexual intercourse with her, when he completed his mission he felt guilty, and went to Khalid and told him about what he did. Khalid said: 'I permit you and made it lawful to you.' He said: 'No not until you write a message to Umar'. (Then they sent a message to Umar) and Umar answered that he (Dharar) should be stoned. By the time Umar's message was delivered, Dharar was dead.
Again, I’ll quote some of the seniormost authorities on Islamic law.
In our view the man who rapes a woman, regardless of whether she is a virgin or not, if she is a free woman he must pay a "dowry" like that of her peers, and if she is a slave he must pay whatever has been detracted from her value. The punishment is to be carried out on the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who has been raped, whatever the case. (Imam Maalik,
Al-Muwatta', Volume 2, page 734)
"If a man acquires by force a slave-girl, then has sexual intercourse with her after he acquires her by force, and if he is not excused by ignorance, then the slave-girl will be taken from him, he is required to pay the fine, and he will receive the punishment for illegal sexual intercourse." (Imam Al Shaafi'i,
Kitaabul Umm, Volume 3, page 253)
You really are one of the most dense individuals I’ve ever come across; you’ve got to be.
I need to stop and let reer buraaq fly sky high to samawade with their myths 
she can refuse to sleep with the enslaver and is not obliged to do so and everything will be all fine and dandy 
I have a easier time believing that MO flew to heaven on the mythical creature called buraaq then believing this load of baloney 
I'll see my self out.
