@๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ @Mudug_gyal join us, silsilada iska jara o wadada haboon ku lugeeya
ma seexanaysaa? I noticed you use ellipsis a lot
Dunya was never meant to be perfect. Everything is a test, and you are right Allah made you a woman for a reason. Everyone has their own trials tailor made to them.I see sexism, as a trial, a test, and us women, must endure in patience, and at the same time, not take it lying down. The best thing for us? Learn our deen, learn our rights, and teach it to others.
The very fact that Muslimahs hold onto their faith, in the face of all this disrespect from Muslim men, and so-called Muslim countries, is a testament of Imaan.
I think it's misogynistic for you to tell a women what they can and cant do@๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ @Mudug_gyal join us, silsilada iska jara o wadada haboon ku lugeeya
Consent wasnt a topic or at least not a well known topic back then as it is now though. people back then would probably look at u weird if u explained what ppl nowadays call marital rape.@Angelina is your argument that because there are differences of opinion between and within the madahib that therefore we can add things into the shariah that weren't there 1,400 years ago?
I am not saying that's your argument. But maybe you could elaborate how I misunderstand your argument.
Marriage is not like Bitcoin or credit cards. Marriage is not a new thing and it existed during the time of Imam Shafi'i and Imam Malik. So if I go check what is in the kitab ul nikah section of a Maliki fiqh book- they might refer back to Imam Malik or his Muwatta.
But if we're dealing with something like Bitcoin- they didn't have Bitcoin during Imam Malik's day so we can't go investigate what he said about Bitcoin.
But marriage is not like Bitcoin. With Bitcoin, we would need to refer to a modern scholar. But marriage is not like Bitcoin. Male and female... it's the same as it was in the days of the sahabah and of the four imams.
edit: btw when i wrote this i hadn't seen ur latest post
Dhirigelin iyo kalsooni baan ku suubinaya, adi ba doonaya inaad lugooysid khiyana ku wareersiidI think it's misogynistic for you to tell a women what they can and cant do
Is your money 6โ3 too?I think it's misogynistic for you to tell a women what they can and cant do
Werenโt you locked in ramadan?@๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ @Mudug_gyal join us, silsilada iska jara o wadada haboon ku lugeeya
Werenโt you locked in ramadan?
@๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ @Mudug_gyal join us, silsilada iska jara o wadada haboon ku lugeeya
ูุฃุนูุฐ ุจููู ุงุช ุงููู ุงูุชุงู ุงุช ุงููุงุชู ูุง ูุฌุงูุฒูู ุจุฑ ููุง ูุงุฌุฑุ ู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ุฎูู ูุจุฑุฃ ูุฐุฑุฃุ ูู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ููุฒู ู ู ุงูุณู ุงุก. ูู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ูุนุฑุฌ ูููุง ูู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ุฐุฑุฃ ูู ุงูุฃุฑุถุ ูู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ูุฎุฑุฌ ู ููุง ูู ู ุดุฑ ูุชู ุงูููู ูุงูููุงุฑ. ูุฃูุถุงู ู ู ุดุฑ ูู ุทุงุฑู ุฅูุง ุทุงุฑูุงู ูุทุฑู ุจุฎูุฑ ูุง ุฑุญู ู
Walaal ruqiyah ha igu akhrinin, I'm only a level 1 shaitan, ibliis iyo @Nin123 ha igu simininูุฃุนูุฐ ุจููู ุงุช ุงููู ุงูุชุงู ุงุช ุงููุงุชู ูุง ูุฌุงูุฒูู ุจุฑ ููุง ูุงุฌุฑุ ู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ุฎูู ูุจุฑุฃ ูุฐุฑุฃุ ูู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ููุฒู ู ู ุงูุณู ุงุก. ูู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ูุนุฑุฌ ูููุง ูู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ุฐุฑุฃ ูู ุงูุฃุฑุถุ ูู ู ุดุฑ ู ุง ูุฎุฑุฌ ู ููุง ูู ู ุดุฑ ูุชู ุงูููู ูุงูููุงุฑ. ูุฃูุถุงู ู ู ุดุฑ ูู ุทุงุฑู ุฅูุง ุทุงุฑูุงู ูุทุฑู ุจุฎูุฑ ูุง ุฑุญู ู
Maya ruqiyah oo sharaxan aad iyo aad oo dabka hada laga qadeey ba dhamantiina uu bahan tihin.Walaal ruqiyah ha igu akhrinin, I'm only a level 1 shaitan, ibliis iyo @Nin123 ha igu siminin
Thatโs why I said to Mudug that the sharia doesnโt recognize martial R and that such an attack would be classed as abuse. In that situation, she can take her husband to court for abuse and whilst the hadd punishment wouldnโt be implemented, he can be tried in different ways.I mean.... I think... like this.... if some guy just pressures his wife emotionally... and she's reluctant... but that's it, he just pressures her emotionally... I don't like it but I wouldn't consider it rape. but if for example... if he straight up assaults... he's physically forcing her, there's bruises... ok.. that... I definitely think that's haraam.
so... if someone says the first case is marital rape... I think that's too much, I don't agree with calling that rape... but the second one definitely yes.... and obviously I think is wrong....
but I think the wife needs to look into a divorce or come up with some solution. is it haram to abuse your wife- definitely. but I don't think the court room should be involved as I don't think that's within the shariah.
I think @Angelina that you are trying to say there is something unclear or something. but I don't know of any difference of opinion. I know Imam Nawawi is considered a reference in Shafi'i fiqh. did he say anything about legal punishment for this as in a hadd punishment or anything like that? what about the big scholars from the Maliki, Hanafi and Hanbali schools? if there's a difference of opinion, ok, whoever wants can go and research the difference of opinion and see what side has the best evidence.... but I don't think there's any difference of opinion here. I don't think taking a husband to court for marital rape is something that exists within say the first 700 years of Islam.
@Angelina have you turned on the idea itself of following the salaf? you don't need to follow some specific modern scholar imo or anything like that but... have you thrown out the concept of following the salaf? if something didn't exist within the shariah with regards to marriage for the first 700 years... you're okay with introducing new rules that didn't exist during that period? Marriage is not like the internet or bitcoin. this is not some new thing that didn't exist during the lives of the four imams.
Example, in the past smoking wasnโt understood and was seen as halal by most of the madahab. Now we know the health issues this causes. Now that we know that marital R causes mental and in many cases of physical issues like tearing of the private parts ect, then scholars can create laws that are still in the bounds of Shariah to tackle this.Consent wasnt a topic or at least not a well known topic back then as it is now though. people back then would probably look at u weird if u explained what ppl nowadays call marital rape.
thatll probably help u understand her argument