I used to live a degenerative lifestyle drinking and smoking and partying 24/7 but I gave all that up (still smoke not as much tho) I went back to college, found a beautiful somali girl, help my parents and 8 siblings out. It all changed when I started watching Jordan Peterson and started to take on responsibility, feels good man
Jordan Peterson has repackaged the self-help stuff and sold it better, and that is ok. But it is not really new or original.
But in topics like politics, culture and religion he is a slime and a fraud. He's the stupid man's intellectual.
For Example, JP makes 5 descriptive claims and no normative claim. So he gives you a reason why something is good, or bad, but never comes up with a solution to the problem because he s afraid that his views might shock people. For example, in two separate videos he has made many descriptive claims why a woman in the workplace would never work. And when the person that interviews him makes the logical conclusion out of the descriptive claims jordan peterson has made, he says "well, i didn't say that, don't strawman me, i'm not saying that a woman should not work". But he started the conversation by saying "we don't have evidence for that", and is further proceeding by giving descriptive information as to why it is bad. But he never makes a normative claim out of that descriptive information. So when a normal person makes a logical conclusion to his stance, he says "well, im not arguing for that". He does that in every field and is a real fraud and a loser when you really look into his style of argumentation. He always argues for the crazy right wing people, but never arges against it. What he doesn't say is actually what should worry you.
And the other thing i noticed was he poses as a left wing centrist, but only talks in right wing talkshows, like Prager University, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro and some crazy race realist people that stands for a white ethnostate.
This is how he talks: Dr Peterson, what’s your favorite color?
Well that depends on what you mean by favorite. And it also depends on what you mean by color. This is a very complex question... One must acknowledge the underlying verisimilitude that is irrevocably nested within a multi-layered metaphysical substrate which many people fundamentally conflate with their ideological presuppositions with no uncertain irregularity, causing the inadvertent dismissal of Jung's archetypal extrapolation of the quintessential axiomatic juxtaposition required to achieve Raskolnikov's magnitude of Neo-Marxist existential nihilism...
That guy acts like a wet vagina imo. He's giving wet vagina's a bad rep, and as a man that loves vaginas, i can't let this go on.
you’re better than a lot of us already broski 
