Odeg
Gedo
Thats interesting question, on the same note can god create another god that is more powerful than him? Keep in mind there is no restriction on gods ability.
I've always wondered if apostates....
- Thread starter Muhajaba
- Start date
- Status
You avoided the question: why would someone who studied biology all the way to university claim that evolution says we evolved from monkeys?
Prince of Lasanod
Eid trim pending
If that was the case, then who created the God that created the other God? And who created that God? This process can go on forever. Clearly it shows that God can only be one, who existed before time, and has always existed.
Hahaha so does our 'common ancestor' look more like our 'ape cousins' or us? Kkkk
Tramo
Nine kitaabs on a bookshelf
200 years? my nigga most speciation takes thousands of years at least. it's pretty much impossible to 'observe' macroevolution directly, but that doesnt mean u can't piece together information to show it did happen
evolution is a continuum, u can't pinpoint the exact point where one species becomes another because it's a very gradual change over thousands of years...but u do know that this one species used to be another at some point. it's like when u look at a color continuum. u cant tell the exact point where this gradient stops being red and becomes blue...but u can obviously tell that it was red at first, then became blue
Avoided the question again! But at least you have Googled it and realised your mistake. How does it feel?
"A little learning is a dangerous thing;
drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
and drinking largely sobers us again."- Pope!
I was referring to microevolution... Nothing that even remotely indicates macroevolution is a possibility was observed. As for the colour continuum... Please stop.200 years? my nigga most speciation takes thousands of years at least. it's pretty much impossible to 'observe' macroevolution directly, but that doesnt mean u can't piece together information to show it did happen
evolution is a continuum, u can't pinpoint the exact point where one species becomes another because it's a very gradual change over thousands of years...but u do know that this one species used to be another at some point. it's like when u look at a color continuum. u cant tell the exact point where this gradient stops being red and becomes blue...but u can obviously tell that it was red at first, then became blue
Macroevolution waa bullshidd
McLovin
VIP
If they did indeed happen, wouldn't they leave clear observable remains for us to study? Because there is no proof of a mass flood 10,000 yrs ago, there is no giant cracks where the moon was split. Buraqs do not roam wild in the arabian deserts where these folklores originated.
Now you could make the argument that God covered up these evidences as an absurd test of faith. But tell me, how merciful would he really be to send people to hell for simply denying this unreasonable faith when it contradicts with the observable reality of this world?
Last edited:
Evolution says you have evolved from an ape. I don't care for details, you came from an ape it tells you. I had an idiot GP once tell me my tonsils were inflamed because of something to do with 'us having gills when we were fish".
I can't believe people with these beliefs actually considered sane.
Tramo
Nine kitaabs on a bookshelf
if u accept microevolution but not macro then thats just being dumb...at least be consistentI was referring to microevolution... Nothing that even remotely indicates macroevolution is a possibility was observed. As for the colour continuum... Please stop.
Macroevolution waa bullshidd
they'r not even useful scientific terms...they're literally the same thing just on different scales
Lolif u accept microevolution but not macro then thats just being dumb...at least be consistent
they'r not even useful scientific terms...they're literally the same thing just on different scales
No it's not man... None of the supposed changes observed even indicate that a specie could possibly transform entirely (to a distinct organism). Microevolution does not prove macroevolution. What you're presenting to us is mere speculation.if u accept microevolution but not macro then thats just being dumb...at least be consistent
they'r not even useful scientific terms...they're literally the same thing just on different scales
Read this brother's article to gain a better understanding bro: https://mohamedghilan.com/2012/03/02/the-theory-i-mean-hypothesis-of-evolution/
Tramo
Nine kitaabs on a bookshelf
No it's not man... None of the supposed changes observed even indicate that a specie could possibly transform entirely (to a distinct organism). On top of that, microevolution does not prove macroevolution.
Read this brother's article to gain a better understanding bro: https://mohamedghilan.com/2012/03/02/the-theory-i-mean-hypothesis-of-evolution/
wtf is a distinct organism
did u really just link me to a blog post
waraa ha na ceebeenin baan ku iri, ur being more embarrassing than the actual dedicated troll right now
That maybe the case, but we have also established you don't know the said details.
Chill. I didn't say it's a scientific journal, don't put words in my mouth ninyahow bilaa edeb. Read the points he raises.wtf is a distinct organism
did u really just link me to a blog post
waraa ha na ceebeenin baan ku iri, ur being more embarrassing than the actual dedicated troll right now
Provide evidence for macro-evolution (or even the possibility of it occurring) and I will shut my mouth,
I can understand your frustration that I claim to have studied your religion but I didn't give a shit enough to take it seriously.
Regurgitating books is for exams not Internet forums.
So your excuse for blundering all over the place with basic mistakes of biology is that you didn't take seriously in school? Nope, still don't buy it. Pardon me, but I highly doubt anyone with even a single biology class under their belt would blunder that bad! But go on, this is quite fun!
Tramo
Nine kitaabs on a bookshelf
macroevolution isn't even a real thing man. there's no difference between the observable microevolution and macroevolution...it's the same shit. like I said, if u accept micro then u accept macro and vice versa. they're both misleading terms that mean the same thing
and if u think it's not the same thing, ask urself at what point does microevolution become macroevolution. if ur answer is, shit idk it's completely arbitrary, then u know it's not a concrete thing...just an umbrella term for simplification
It's almost past my bedtime but maybe you could explain to me how you reconcile evolution with the second law of thermodynamics.
Wallahi iyo Billahi they are not the same thing man... You still don't get it do you? You're displaying incredible ignorance sxb. Do more research on your own, I'm done here.
- Status
