Israelite Abel Beth Maacah Haplogroup subclade T-CTS6280

[Araabi]

According to Family Tree DNA, the Somali Dir subclade T-BY181210 emerged from its ancestor T-CTS6280 who was a man who lived in 1990 BCE according to the estimates from Family Tree DNA.

@NidarNidar
@Arabsiyawi
@Step a side

Older study, I'm sure you guys must have seen this before, I'm always very late in the game.

 

[haile_selassie]

Yea T are the Israelites lost tribe

 

[giire12]

Is it time to say Haplogroup T should be treated like Haplogroup J as in not cushite in origin. Like Carab Salax is seen as Semetic in origin, We accepted J as Semtic maybe its time to accept the T somalis as Semetic Somalis?

 

[Arabsiyawi]

View attachment 368855



According to Family Tree DNA, the Somali Dir subclade T-BY181210 emerged from its ancestor T-CTS6280 who was a man who lived in 1990 BCE according to the estimates from Family Tree DNA.

@NidarNidar
@Arabsiyawi
@Step a side

Older study, I'm sure you guys must have seen this before, I'm always very late in the game.

FTDNA doesn't say that. CTS2860 is on a very different branch of T.
This twitter account isn't reliable at all. He's quite obsessed actually. Especially with trying to prove his lineage, E-M81, is not North African but actually Canaanite. From what I've seen, he's constantly partaking in "haplogroup FKD" against any Arab or MidEastern bearing other lineages like J, T or G kkkk.

Here, us VS the excavated Canaanite individual from Ancient Israel (according to FTDNA and Yfull live)

Yea T are the Israelites lost tribe

Lol. Israelites were diverse Y-DNA wise and all their descendants are as well.

 

[haile_selassie]

Is it time to say Haplogroup T should be treated like Haplogroup J as in not cushite in origin. Like Carab Salax is seen as Semetic in origin, We accepted J as Semtic maybe its time to accept the T somalis as Semetic Somalis?

Yes and no. T in Somalis is literaly Semitic and should be treated like J . But the older T in other groups like Chadians, Nubians, Sudanese and Egyptians has deeper Afro Asiatic foundations

 

[NidarNidar]

Yes and no. T in Somalis is literaly Semitic and should be treated like J . But the older T in other groups like Chadians, Nubians, Sudanese and Egyptians has deeper Afro Asiatic foundations

Even with T its been in the levant since before 10,000 bce and linked with the PPNB culture, which was home to the oldest megalithic culture, which was Afroasiatic in origin, mix between E, T, G and J1 markers have been found.

 

[Garaad Awal]

Yes and no. T in Somalis is literaly Semitic and should be treated like J . But the older T in other groups like Chadians, Nubians, Sudanese and Egyptians has deeper Afro Asiatic foundations

There’s a Raxanweyn Af-Maay speaker with Cushitic T-M70 and shares an ancient clade with the Tigre

 

[The alchemist]

That Somali clade descends from another, parallel lineage. You have to go back to the mid-9th millennium BP to find a common ancestor, times of flint stones.

To the point of almost complete genetic indifference, the Iron Age Israelites had phased with Canaanites, expressing such genetics regionally. This guy's claim of no Iranian Neolithic admixted Cananite mxture among the Israelites is ridlicous.

I don't know why every Twitter dweeb makes things up. The so-called Israel period sample was definitey Iron Age Canaanite.

The Pompeii individuals were mixed.

The I3685 individual was half Arab genetically:

I've already made a thread showing that, similar to broad imperial Rome, the Pompeii elites were MENA. It's quite fascinating. The other guys looked (modern) Jew-like (in their approximate mixture; as European Jews are basically a people that had a considerable stay in those parts, recieving much gene-flow).

 

[haile_selassie]

That Somali clade descends from another, parallel lineage. You have to go back to the mid-9th millennium BP to find a common ancestor, times of flint stones.

To the point of almost complete genetic indifference, the Iron Age Israelites had phased with Canaanites, expressing such genetics regionally. This guy's claim of no Iranian Neolithic admixted Cananite mxture among the Israelites is ridlicous.
View attachment 368891

I don't know why every Twitter dweeb makes things up. The so-called Israel period sample was definitey Iron Age Canaanite.

The Pompeii individuals were mixed.

The I3685 individual was half Arab genetically:View attachment 368866

I've already made a thread showing that, similar to broad imperial Rome, the Pompeii elites were MENA. It's quite fascinating. The other guys looked (modern) Jew-like (in their approximate mixture; as European Jews are basically a people that had a considerable stay in those parts, recieving much gene-flow).

True