Puntland is ready but democratic process has been neglected for the past years its time the people demand their rights in the coming years. Our election time is always peaceful, peaceful protests, peaceful parliament that's Puntland people for you, unlike others.I think it's time for Puntland to take the plunge and adopt universal suffrage for their future elections.
Looking at how peaceful the campaigning has been I believe that they're ready for the next step.
Why has the process been neglected? Is it due to corruption, security or negligence...Puntland is ready but democratic process has been neglected for the past years its time the people demand their rights in the coming years. Our election time is always peaceful, peaceful protests, peaceful parliament that's Puntland people for you, unlike others.
Why has the process been neglected? Is it due to corruption, security or negligence...
To be honest I dont see why OMOV elections can't happen now. Candidates are having public events all over the state with no major issues.
Maybe next time, this year election process is obviously determined.I think it's time for Puntland to take the plunge and adopt universal suffrage for their future elections.
Looking at how peaceful the campaigning has been I believe that they're ready for the next step.
I don't see the added value of one man one vote. If the system ain't broken, it doesn't need to be fixed.
Yes exactly this^The added value is that it gives a lot of international legitimacy to the state. In a sense, Puntland is semi democratic in that it reflects the will of the majority of residents. But if we were to go for a direct democracy we could have much more political power in our dealings vis a vis the FGS. It would also increase foreign aid to Puntland, probably. The current system also favors the incumbent and encourages corruption. The president has control of a substantial budget and his opponents donβt, which means that he is incentivized to use this advantage. There is also good reason to think that the longer democratization is delayed, the harder it will become to implement in the future.
One of the main reasons I am opposed to the reelection of Gaas is his delaying of one man one vote.
The added value is that it gives a lot of international legitimacy to the state. In a sense, Puntland is semi democratic in that it reflects the will of the majority of residents. But if we were to go for a direct democracy we could have much more political power in our dealings vis a vis the FGS. It would also increase foreign aid to Puntland, probably. The current system also favors the incumbent and encourages corruption. The president has control of a substantial budget and his opponents donβt, which means that he is incentivized to use this advantage. There is also good reason to think that the longer democratization is delayed, the harder it will become to implement in the future.
One of the main reasons I am opposed to the reelection of Gaas is his delaying of one man one vote.
I understand where you come from. My objection is that we are very clan oriented society. The differences between the men running for office is their clan, not policy or ideology. I do not see the point of having 'democratic' elections in a very egalitarian society as ours. It will be a circus show like our western neighbours wherein the candidates will tour the country and ride on donkeys.
Fighting corruption can be done without one man one vote. There are many legitimate governments that do not have democracy. They are taken serious by the IC because they take themselves serious.
we don't need a democracy at allPuntland isn't ready for it yet. If Punland prematurely implements this, we risk the chance of becoming like Somaliland. They have this and at the same time arrest kids for making fun of the way the president walks! Puntland doesn't need a fake democracy. Anyways, the status quo will remain for the foreseeable future.