Erythrean
🇺🇸 PROUD MURICAN!!! Hamitic Horner Race
We’re better. Y’all Nilotes lost against us because we left for better lands while y’all sat in the desert.How funny that the lost children of Sudan + Egypt should say this
![]()
We’re better. Y’all Nilotes lost against us because we left for better lands while y’all sat in the desert.How funny that the lost children of Sudan + Egypt should say this
![]()
Natufians and Proto-nilotes.Somalis are literally the result of North Africans and Sub-Saharan Africans
Almost every ethnicity has some admixture by this point, even if minor.Do you agree or disagree.
It's more of a hypothetical question the world is way too mixed now but it would be interesting to see how life would have been if every single ethnicity had their own land and had zero contact with all the various ethnicities that existAlmost every ethnicity has some admixture by this point, even if minor.
They would be inbred… it’s that simple..It's more of a hypothetical question the world is way too mixed now but it would be interesting to see how life would have been if every single ethnicity had their own land and had zero contact with all the various ethnicities that exist
how do you think humans came into existenceThey would be inbred… it’s that simple..
Rehashing my answer from other thread;
It’s good. We need more mixing to strengthen the genes. The more diverse the less defects. The more inbred the more defects. Look at the family’s in Appalachian mountains in the South-Arkansas, Georgia etc them states the hillbilly’s do cousin marrying, The hills have eyes type stuff. Look at this family for example who are a family of generations of inbreeding
Places like Brazil, the people look very healthy due to the wide range of mixing of native, black Africans and Europeans. Another place that has inbred practices south India and parts of Pakistan. Indians are least desired on average because of these said practises the people come out funny looking.
Poor example tbh. The Japanese were already a mix of several East Asian groups. Japan is an island, humans had to travel to that island from the mainland. They weren’t originally homegenous like Indians for example, or Somali.I disagree on that.
Take the Japanese for example: they haven’t mixed with any groups; they retained their cultural roots for centuries and known to be the most advanced communities.
Again, take the Yiddish groups (Ashkenazi Jews) they practice endogamy and are known to be the most dominant social class. (Don’t approve their practices btw).
Marrying from your tribe is pursuing your lineage.
The only problem is marrying too close by your family side.
also, interracial gonna create confused kids.
Poor example tbh. The Japanese were already a mix of several East Asian groups. Japan is an island, humans had to travel to that island from the mainland. They weren’t originally homegenous like Indians for example, or Somali.
I’m aware of the xenophobia and present issues, I’m referring to the ORIGINAL settlers who came to Japan. We all know humans didn’t just originate where they live today, everyone started off in east Africa and half made their way out the continent. To get to Japan, you would have to sail from China after already having settled in that mainland, the people that went to Japan, were already a mix of several East Asians . This is all documented saxibUmm… Indians are never homogeneous. They have the most diverse groups with different sects and traditions. That’s a common knowledge.
Also, Japan are homogeneous since they retain their culture and have a very restrict and oriented culture.
Remember: Japan were historically based of clans.
but since they made contact with the West & became influenced and advanced; they change their tribalistic ways.
But that doesn’t mean they became adapted to multiculturalism.
There’s wide grown range of xenophobia in Japan they don’t approve foreigners.