Somali slurs and cusses are laced with the most potent trvthnvkes. That caqli liix sac shi kills me. It too, is racialised btw. Or at least where my dad is from.This remind me of a word or rather a "slur" Somalis used for bantus: "Oggi"
It means "today" in demostrating bantu people's understanding in the concept of time![]()
Find me a single thing from 500AD sub-Saharan Africa (not Horn or Sudan) that can compare in artistic complexity to a random proto-Germanic artefact, or even a Nordic Bronze Age pendant lol. You guys need to retire that shit it only makes Africans look worse cos if Europeans were making better art than Africans in worse civilizational state, there's very little wiggle room dawg.A millennium and a half ago most of Europe was literally living huts, so what does that say about them and how they thought of the future compared to Bantu’s?
I know das right!A real african is talking you POS. YOU STFU and LISTEN invader!
Skin tone doesn’t matter, indians are darker than black africans yet their phenotypes are completely different, if we weren’t in the african continent we wouldn’t get lumped in with them because of how different we look.Ur skintone is still the same as hers don't hate ur neighbours. Much of these African countries are doing much better than us too.
My point is these westerners act like civilization wasn’t also handed to them by the romans. They cling onto what was mostly taught to them as if they came up with it on their own.Find me a single thing from 500AD sub-Saharan Africa (not Horn or Sudan) that can compare in artistic complexity to a random proto-Germanic artefact, or even a Nordic Bronze Age pendant lol. You guys need to retire that shit it only makes Africans look worse cos if Europeans were making better art than Africans in worse civilizational state, there's very little wiggle room dawg.
My point is these westerners act like civilization wasn’t also handed to them by the romans. They cling onto what was mostly taught to them as if they came up with it on their own.
Yeah there’s literally none lmao, been saying for ages that anything below northerneastern africa is literally qashiinFind me a single thing from 500AD sub-Saharan Africa (not Horn or Sudan) that can compare in artistic complexity to a random proto-Germanic artefact, or even a Nordic Bronze Age pendant lol. You guys need to retire that shit it only makes Africans look worse cos if Europeans were making better art than Africans in worse civilizational state, there's very little wiggle room dawg.
Europeans are all related through indo europeans, western huntergatherer and anatolian neolithic farmer there’s nothing that links us to africans below northerneastern africa, even proto nilotic is false since cushites were in horn even before nile valley, africas twice the diversity of any other continent, indo yaar don’t claim middle eastern history even tho same continent.My point is these westerners act like civilization wasn’t also handed to them by the romans. They cling onto what was mostly taught to them as if they came up with it on their own.
While Bantus aren't our brethren, it's still very tasteless to publicly distance ourselves from them. Europeans and Asians alike view all of Sub-Saharan Africa as a despotic hellscape that contributes nothing to the world, even the North Africans share this view. You are very naive if you think Horn of Africa + Sudan is spared from this characterization. We are not Bantus, Khoisans, or Pgymies but the greater world doesn't care. The more we fight against being seen as Black/Sub-Saharan, the more credence is given to theories like the Hamitic hypothesis.Europeans are all related through indo europeans, western huntergatherer and anatolian neolithic farmer there’s nothing that links us to africans below northerneastern africa, even proto nilotic is false since cushites were in horn even before nile valley, africas twice the diversity of any other continent, indo yaar don’t claim middle eastern history even tho same continent.