Okay sure, you actually think I didn't study physics with such confidence
Physics does make sense you idiot, it's a subject based on facts. The problem I have is with theoretical physics which is now off on a complete tangent ever since they started to ignore Sagnac's experiment and others, or at best cope with illogical baseless mathematical theories that don't reflect reality.
But you're the expert on a subject you don't know anything about except trivial shit in pop culture.
Secondly, although I don't usually speak in laconic phrases, the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Finally you yourself believe in a religion that comically denies that it is. You believe in metaphysical naturalism, just as many of the New Atheism movement do. Your words today and the beliefs you've shown mirror that of religious people who deny the legitimacy of other worldviews and aggressively promote their own. They view any disagreement as blasphemy and force their religion in the name of a truth that has been proven. In the name of facts they do not know. In the name of theories that aren't concrete.
You my dear friend are a believer in this religion, whether you admit it or not. You have your priests, these scientists and self proclaimed defenders of "the truth", who religiously preach with babbles of nonsense. Demonising those who don't agree with them as unscientific when they themselves purposely and falsely portray beliefs as concrete evidence.
I could go on about your meta ethical delusions and other proofs that you have faith in a baseless religion, but an uneducated believer like yourself wouldn't be able to cope with the information overload.
You choose to believe in these theories. It was a choice you took not based on a fact. If you can't conceive your hypocrisy you prove how deeply religious you are.
Okay sure, you actually think I didn't study physics with such confidence
Physics does make sense you idiot, it's a subject based on facts. The problem I have is with theoretical physics which is now off on a complete tangent ever since they started to ignore Sagnac's experiment and others, or at best cope with illogical baseless mathematical theories that don't reflect reality.
But you're the expert on a subject you don't know anything about except trivial shit in pop culture.
Secondly, although I don't usually speak in laconic phrases, the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Finally you yourself believe in a religion that comically denies that it is. You believe in metaphysical naturalism, just as many of the New Atheism movement do. Your words today and the beliefs you've shown mirror that of religious people who deny the legitimacy of other worldviews and aggressively promote their own. They view any disagreement as blasphemy and force their religion in the name of a truth that has been proven. In the name of facts they do not know. In the name of theories that aren't concrete.
You my dear friend are a believer in this religion, whether you admit it or not. You have your priests, these scientists and self proclaimed defenders of "the truth", who religiously preach with babbles of nonsense. Demonising those who don't agree with them as unscientific when they themselves purposely and falsely portray beliefs as concrete evidence.
I could go on about your meta ethical delusions and other proofs that you have faith in a baseless religion, but an uneducated believer like yourself wouldn't be able to cope with the information overload.
You choose to believe in these theories. It was a choice you took not based on a fact. If you can't conceive your hypocrisy you prove how deeply religious you are.
I assume nothint , simply infer a perfect model from a detailed analysis.
I can immediately tell an uneducated fool when I see one. Your type often exposes their conspiratorial wishful thinking in your bursts of utter ignorance.
The Sagnec effect can be explained perfectly through a relativistic model and has been shown so since 1921. The fact that you discard physics since 1921 displays your hard headedness.
Einstein's mathematical model of physics has been tested rigorously through its vast applications in experimental Engineering.
As for assuming my lack of familiarity in physics , I am embarking on my honours in theoretical physics at the highest University in my region.Unlike you I do not watch conspiracy channels which regurgitate debunked "quirks" in failed models.
I have said nothing of ethics nor is my field even vaguely religious. Sure it debunks ignorant claims to glory by fools like you but it is no more religious then saying a plate is clean or a house is 10 metres tall.
I have no priests, scientists often probe others wrong and gain notoriety not through wild claims but rigorous Mathematical and experimental models.
Nothing in science is solid but instead built on models which have strong predictive power. These models change just like Newton's deterministic model transmorphed into the Quantum probabilistic model.
I take all truths temporary and question everything , that is my belief system
