Please real stuff ok none of this I am balanced and listen. I will give a scenario, tell me how you get out of this with what you want.
Person A
1. You rent and don't want to give 100 for rent
2. Person says pay up and dont stall and if u stall the more angry. Person adds more threat if u dont pay u starve and sleep outside.
Person B
1. Trump Denuke or suffer STARVATION. Same equivalent threat of Person A who said starve outside and leave home
2. Kim I love my nukes(pride, asset, prestige). This scenario of Person A who wants to keep his 100 and can't afford it
How does Person A get to keep his 100 without being kicked out, how does Kim get to keep his nukes without being starved. There has been some preconditions set by Trump, NO STALLING cause we all try that shit when we don't wanna do something at an individual or state level.
The key advantage here is. Siege tool by Trump and Maximum pressure. Kim had his friend China but their friends on interests and was abadoned as expected by an interest relationship.
See bro how simple individual things can even be translated at state level, if you can figure it out at the individual level you will also figure it out in the state level lol.
So if you can answer Person A is the same tactic applicable to KIM to also keep his nukes? remember it's all just wants just like u wanna keep your 100 bucks he wanna keep his nukes, so how u formulate your tactics and get to keep what u want will set u apart as negiotator.
I haven't tried this shit before and I am not good at it. I try to avoid a situation or plan around a scenario ever leading to negiotation
Person A
1. You rent and don't want to give 100 for rent
2. Person says pay up and dont stall and if u stall the more angry. Person adds more threat if u dont pay u starve and sleep outside.
Person B
1. Trump Denuke or suffer STARVATION. Same equivalent threat of Person A who said starve outside and leave home
2. Kim I love my nukes(pride, asset, prestige). This scenario of Person A who wants to keep his 100 and can't afford it
How does Person A get to keep his 100 without being kicked out, how does Kim get to keep his nukes without being starved. There has been some preconditions set by Trump, NO STALLING cause we all try that shit when we don't wanna do something at an individual or state level.
The key advantage here is. Siege tool by Trump and Maximum pressure. Kim had his friend China but their friends on interests and was abadoned as expected by an interest relationship.
See bro how simple individual things can even be translated at state level, if you can figure it out at the individual level you will also figure it out in the state level lol.
So if you can answer Person A is the same tactic applicable to KIM to also keep his nukes? remember it's all just wants just like u wanna keep your 100 bucks he wanna keep his nukes, so how u formulate your tactics and get to keep what u want will set u apart as negiotator.
I haven't tried this shit before and I am not good at it. I try to avoid a situation or plan around a scenario ever leading to negiotation