Hitler Exposed by His own Words.

[Omar del Sur]

I am tired of seeing attempts at making Hitler seem like a good guy. Hitler said some true things about yahud. He was also an extremely evil person with a white supremacist ideology. I don't understand why people act like they can't grasp that just because somebody says some true things, that doesn't mean you should accept their ideology overall. Ben Shapiro says some true things about leftist degeneracy- however, the guy is still a zionist genocidal maniac. Hitler was a freemason who was controlled opposition to the New World Order. But you don't have to believe me about that, this thread is about Hitler according to his own words- all the quotes here are from his book Mein Kampf.

Btw I was exposing yahud all the way back in 2019

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/jews-control-the-media.71408/

the yahud are behind communism, run media, feminism (btw the founding text of modern feminism is The Feminine Mystique- which i read btw- it was written by "Betty Friedan" whose real name was Naomi Goldstein who was a communist jewess) ... all of that is old news, none of that is anything new or groundbreaking and I was talking about that a long time ago. Hitler was fake opposition. but enough about my own thoughts, let's get into Hitler according to his own words (btw what is below I am copying and pasting from another thread where I talked about him)

huh.... I didn't know this... so apparently besides promoting the idea that Africans are "primitive and inferior" he also thought they were healthy. I can't grasp the mindset of Hitler sympathizers. He was right on a few issues (but what he's right about can be found in other places- Jewish plots bad, Marxism bad, feminism bad) but Hitler-worship makes no sense. His whole philosophy is "superiority of the Aryan race". He is basically Zionism for white people. Plus Hitler was a freemason.

there is nothing really to learn from Hitler besides "white man superior". his philosophy is for white people.

if you're playing chess... even if you feel a sense of inferiority with regards to your opponent... and maybe even they are better at chess.... even so- you can't just copy their strategy and start doing the moves that would sense for them. they are playing from a specific position and you are playing from a completely different position. you have to come up with a strategy designed for your position, you won't get anywhere with a strategy designed for your opponent's position.

what benefit are people possibly going to get from reading about why according to Hitler it is human progress to enslave "inferior races"? and this is leaving out the part where Hitler explains why according to him, the "superior races" should take the land of "inferior races".


I don't know of him saying anything about a master race and I don't care if he wants to conquer Europe but he definitely believed in "superior/inferior races" and would have considered everyone on this board as "inferior race".

 

[Omar del Sur]

btw being a Hitler fan as a Muslim goes against al wala wal bara which is a core part of aqeedah. and if ur skin isn't the color of snow... I would think it goes against your own self-respect...

 

[Do]

It's sad that you had to type this all out for the unnecessarily contrarian users on here.

 

[techsamatar]

One fact: The Victors write history. Hitler undoubtedly opposed war and offered 35 peace overtures, five of which were to Poland. The only people who desired war were the international banking barons; there were no homeless people in Germany. He performed a miracle during a time when the United States and the United Kingdom owned the majority of the earth's landmass, and while America and the United Kingdom had 11 million hungry unemployed people and 4 million people, respectively. In just six years, Hitler eliminated poverty, created jobs for 6 million people, rebuilt homes and dwellings, and even created the people's car, the Volkswagen, which is still in use today.

The plutocrats and Jewish bankers used Poland as a pawn to start a war against him because they knew he had everything to lose and nothing to gain from going to war. He produced his own money, outlawed interest and riba, and drove out the bankers.

It's also advised to avoid speaking without knowledge in Islam since Only Allah knows the Side of the Vanquished. The average English person is unaware that he never desired a war with Britain, a plan for global dominance, or even that blonde hair and blue eyes nonsense . You were never even permitted to hear or read his speeches in English in school, let alone his party writings from 1919 to 1945.

Everything you know about him or WW2 is the perspective of what the winners said.

I do not agree with his belief of One race being more better and advanced which in 20th century every westerner believed in even the leaders of the so called Hero Allies, but his racial policies or belief was never that he should conquer and exterminate other races of Europe or the world its Jewish propaganda.

 

[The alchemist]

I read parts of Mein Kampf. That guy was an utter jahil who worshipped the notion of evolution.

Hitler believed very strongly that human races were evolutionary in a hierarchy and that mixing between the superior and inferior was a "sin" because it would go against evolution and the laws that shaped that hierarchy on pure "nature" laws. The superior would have the right to dominate and push the inferiors to the margin and even restrict their reproductive abilities if they wished to. He wrote this in his book. So, any guy who tries to spin Hitler as some nice guy is, in fact, either an ignorant fool or an actual enemy of humanity and Islam.

The guy worshipped the social Darwinian perception of nature in its effects on humans and how he thought that process resulted in the German race being superior.

He believed that subjugating the "inferior" races was justified even if the methods were harsh because only the Aryan race was the pinnacle of humanity, whereas the inferior people were merely tools for laying the groundwork of civilization (civilization is merely monopolized by Aryans in his worldview) -- he even used a machine analogy for these "inferiors". He stated that anything civilizational had either a direct or indirect association with Aryans.

He claimed the "Tautonic" race (American Whites) were superior because they had strict racial separation. Then he claimed the Southern American Iberians mixed with Aboriginals, lowering their status on this value scale of his.

I truly question the deen of any Muslim who knows this yet supports it. It is un-Islamic. The guy was a Darwinian evolutionist snob that had an evil ideology.

 

[Omar del Sur]

It's sad that you had to type this all out for the unnecessarily contrarian users on here.

everything above the first extract from his book (the first three paragraphs of OP)- all that I just typed, everything below I copied and pasted from another thread where I addressed this insane attempt at trying to promote him. I don't understand.... how can someone call somebody an inferior race and write out a philosophy calling for their enslavement.... and then the person who is called an "inferior race" goes and gives dawah to that person's philosophy? dawah should be to Islam, not to any other system of belief.




There is a very beautiful section from Surah Al-An'am I'd like to quote:

"Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Come! Let me recite to you what your Lord has forbidden to you: do not associate others with Him ˹in worship˺. ˹Do not fail to˺ honour your parents. Do not kill your children for fear of poverty. We provide for you and for them. Do not come near indecencies, openly or secretly. Do not take a ˹human˺ life—made sacred by Allah—except with ˹legal˺ right. This is what He has commanded you, so perhaps you will understand."

And do not approach the orphan's property except in a way that is best [i.e., intending improvement] until he reaches maturity. And give full measure and weight in justice. We do not charge any soul except [with that within] its capacity. And when you speak [i.e., testify], be just, even if [it concerns] a near relative. And the covenant of Allāh fulfill. This has He instructed you that you may remember.

And, [moreover], this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way. This has He instructed you that you may become righteous."

-Surah Al-An'am 151:153 (translation of the meaning)


this is a very famous and beautiful section from that Surah. anyways, one of the ten things that are commanded here is:

"this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way.".

so anybody who calls to following any other din, ideology, philosophy way of life other than Islam is violating what is commanded in that verse. whether it's Hitlerism, communism, whatever it is.

 

[The alchemist]

He wrote extensively about his corrupt ideology, and left no ambiguity in the matters that I mentioned:

 

[Omar del Sur]

One fact: The Victors write history.

One fact: Everything I quoted here was written by Hitler in his book Mein Kampf which he wrote and published before the war.

 

[Omar del Sur]

btw being a Hitler fan as a Muslim goes against al wala wal bara which is a core part of aqeedah. and if ur skin isn't the color of snow... I would think it goes against your own self-respect...

@techsamatar why did you qashin this? do you have a problem with al wala wal bara? wallahi any Muslim who calls to Hitler's philosophy indeed has a problem with al wala bara. al wala wal bara is a basic part of aqeedah and no Muslim has any right to oppose it.

 

[Omar del Sur]

View attachment 315432

btw this proves... his philosophy revolves around racism sort of like Islam is based around tawheed. so it's not like the white supremacism is some side note or some side thing, it is the central pillar of his philosophy.

 

[The alchemist]

btw this proves... his philosophy revolves around racism sort of like Islam is based around tawheed. so it's not like the white supremacism is some side note or some side thing, it is the central pillar of his philosophy.

I updated with more texts of his.

 

[techsamatar]

btw this proves... his philosophy revolves around racism sort of like Islam is based around tawheed. so it's not like the white supremacism is some side note or some side thing, it is the central pillar of his philosophy.

He was Non Muslim and everyone in 20th century believed this in the western world what is so ground-breaking LOL. He Admired Islam and wanted it for Germanic people and called it Religion of Intelligent people - Himmler studied the Quran and during the war said to his doctor that how after the war he wanted to go to Islamic world and further his studies.

I could care less about his racial theories which every one in world had not something new but he never believed or even called for exterminating all races of world except Aryan he never he wanted war in Europe except to unite and get the German lands back, the swastizka idea was meant for peace and new Germany.

I will soon make threads on his speeches all the way till 1945 and his writings, we will see if this is a person who was a warmonger or wanted Racial dominance and world conquest.

 

[techsamatar]

View attachment 315432

He wrote extensively about his corrupt ideology, and left no ambiguity in the matters that I mentioned:

View attachment 315433

This Idea was not new and in 20th century every leader in western world including the Allies who you dupes think are heroes believed this, this does not change the fact he never wanted war nor world dominance or to exterminate any race or ethnic group.

 

[Omar del Sur]

He was Non Muslim and everyone in 20th century believed this in the western world what is so ground-breaking LOL. He Admired Islam and wanted it for Germanic people and called it Religion of Intelligent people - Himmler studied the Quran and during the war said to his doctor that how after the war he wanted to go to Islamic world and further his studies.

I could care less about his racial theories which every one in world had not something new but he never believed or even called for exterminating all races of world except Aryan he never he wanted war in Europe except to unite and get the German lands back, the swastizka idea was meant for peace and new Germany.

I will soon make threads on his speeches all the way till 1945 and his writings, we will see if this is a person who was a warmonger or wanted Racial dominance and world conquest.

وَأَنَّ هَـٰذَا صِرَٰطِى مُسْتَقِيمًۭا فَٱتَّبِعُوهُ ۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا۟ ٱلسُّبُلَ فَتَفَرَّقَ بِكُمْ عَن سَبِيلِهِۦ ۚ ذَٰلِكُمْ وَصَّىٰكُم بِهِۦ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَتَّقُونَ

And, [moreover], this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way. This has He instructed you that you may become righteous.

-Surah Al-An'am 6:153

 

[Omar del Sur]

This Idea was not new and in 20th century every leader in western world including the Allies who you dupes think are heroes believed this, this does not change the fact he never wanted war nor world dominance or to exterminate any race or ethnic group.

I don't consider the Allies as heroes and I don't know of Alchemist considering them as heroes either.

 

[techsamatar]

وَأَنَّ هَـٰذَا صِرَٰطِى مُسْتَقِيمًۭا فَٱتَّبِعُوهُ ۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا۟ ٱلسُّبُلَ فَتَفَرَّقَ بِكُمْ عَن سَبِيلِهِۦ ۚ ذَٰلِكُمْ وَصَّىٰكُم بِهِۦ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَتَّقُونَ

And, [moreover], this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way. This has He instructed you that you may become righteous.

-Surah Al-An'am 6:153

Who on earth said I Follow Hitler LOL.

 

[Chase]

You can't be Muslim and support Hitler and his Nazi idealogy, it's an oxymoron.

If he was targetting Jews, who had a closer relationship to the average Cadaan than the Muslim, just imagine what he would have done to us.

Only a psychopath would support that nincompoop.

 

[The alchemist]

This Idea was not new and in 20th century every leader in western world including the Allies who you dupes think are heroes believed this, this does not change the fact he never wanted war nor world dominance or to exterminate any race or ethnic group.

I never said that people in the Western world were not racist, and that is not the point. The point is that his worldview scrutinized for what it was alone, including his actions, makes my assessment quite correct, no matter how racist Churchill was. The other countries believed in similar stuff informed by Social Darwinian roots, using that disposition to justify colonialism. Still, you don't see anyone here trying to clean up the image, rebranding colonization and colonialists and their subjugation plans, do you? If we're being honest too, even much of the Western European racism outside ex-slaveholder countries was milder compared to the ideology of Hitler, which I quoted affirmed even worse sentiments by calling all the worst aspects justified and necessary.

You're also not honest when comparing fascistic countries that derive much of their boundary-setting and inter-country relationships based on racial affinity, coupled with strict genetic obsessive primordialism and un-Islamic collective self-centered arrogance to typical modern nationalism that is more civic-based, granted that even that can sometimes border on the edge of the extremes. There is an injustice in doing that, namely taking extreme cases that Muslims faced the brunt of -- both in North Africa and the Horn of Africa -- as merely just nationalism that is common everywhere. Omitting those definitive and respective nuances exposes that you're doing the image-washing quite deliberately.

"...this does not change the fact he never wanted war nor world dominance or to exterminate any race or ethnic group."

You missed his whole ideology, or you're not being honest again; read his quotes. I don't subscribe to moral relativism, a direct callout to how seeing you invokes such argumentation from whataboutism attempts to shift the goalpost to make the landscape morally gray, appealing to a sort of "old world Western" thinking. The truth stands that all those Western nations were scum to various degrees -- that is a fact. But Hitler is the topic here, so don't wiggle your way with nonsense.

To kill the claim you made that I quoted, let me drop a quote from Hitler again:

Now, take back all your words, or you're a fraud who only wants to spread false ideas without getting checked.

By the way, don't throw the silly 'you support the allies' nonsense on me. It does not work. I have extensively and heavily criticized the entire Western body and its vile modern history. Those subversive, blame-shifting ad hominem I am immune to."Heroes," really? That does not sound like me. I have never said that in my life. Stay on topic, and don't lie. You can objectively criticize several actors despite two sides being wrong and doing wrong to each other without pathetically devolving things by presenting low-level accusations of taking sides nonsense by trying to throw a smokescreen on a precise topic into a broad, unprincipled, "either-or" conversation that does not concern the topic or my position on the goalpost shift you're trying force desperately. You can attempt to be an adult when you mention me next time.

Anyway, if you still don't concede after this, then all levels of integrity are lost, and I will not need to write further. I dropped direct quotes from Hitler himself that you chose to ignore when they debunked your points.

 

[techsamatar]

Did Any Fascist Regime get overthrown for their treatment of their people? Communism had more deaths and terror and the British also who controlled 25% of Landmass on earth and created concentration camp Idea during Boer wars.

Let See what Hitler Really Felt and Wrote about World conquest Propaganda you Duped Imbecile: Does this Sound Like a Man who wanted war and World conquest something British empire already acquired and they still could not solve Unemployment.

Hitler on peace
From Adolf Hitler, The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939.
London: Oxford University Press, 1942. 2 February

1933: "Any one like myself who knows what war is is aware of what a squandering of effort, or rather consumption of strength, is involved." (p. 1003)

23 March 1933: The German nation wishes to live in peace with the rest of the world. (pp. 1016-17)

17 May 1933: "It is, however, in the interests of all that present-day problems should be solved in a reasonable and final manner. No new European war could improve the unsatisfactory conditions of the present day. On the contrary, the application of violence of any kind in Europe could have no favourable effect upon the political or economic position which exists to-day. Even the ultimate effect would be to increase the disturbance of European equilibrium and thus, in one manner or another, to sow the seed of further conflicts and complications. The result would be fresh wars, fresh uncertainty, and fresh economic distress. The outbreak of such infinite madness, however, would necessarily cause the collapse of the present social and political order. A Europe sinking into Communistic chaos would bring about a crisis, the extent and duration of which could not be foreseen. It is the earnest desire of the National Government of the German Reich to prevent such a disturbing development by means of its honest and active co-operation. (p. 1046)

17 May 1933: "We therefore have no use for the idea of Germanization. The mentality of the past century which made people believe that they could make Germans out of Poles and Frenchmen is completely foreign to us;" (p. 1047)

17 May 1933: "Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the world does the same, Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking but only of acquiring security."(p. 1056)

17 May 1933: "The German Government wishes to come to a peaceful agreement with other nations on all difficult questions. They know that in any military action in Europe, even if completely successful, the sacrifice would be out of all proportion to any possible gains." (pp. 1056-1057)

27 May 1933: "We want no war waged only with the object of bringing over perhaps some millions of folk to Germany who have no wish whatever to be Germans and who cannot be Germans. We shall never attempt to subject folk who in their hearts only hate us at the price of sacrificing on the field of battle millions of those who are dear to us and whom we love." (p. 1061)

May 1933: "We desire peace perhaps more than all others, since we need it in order to create bread for the millions of our unemployed fellow-countrymen."(p. 1079)

28 August 1933: "We have declared a hundred times that we wish for peace. None of us wishes to incorporate an alien people into our State, but what God has made into a people belongs to that people, and if treaties are to be sacred, then they must be sacred not only for us but for our opponents." (p. 1085) @The alchemist

14 October 1933: "The German Government and the German people are unanimous in their will to pursue a policy of peace, of conciliation and understanding, as a basis of all decisions and of every action. The German Government and the German people therefore reject force as an unserviceable means for the removal of existing differences within the community of European States. The German Government and the German people renew their profession that they will gladly concur in every actual disarmament of the world together with the assurance of their willingness to destroy the last German machine-gun and to discharge the last man from the army in so far as the other peoples decide to do the same." (pp. 1090-91)

5 November 1933: "I know well what war means: I have seen it with my own eyes: and many a statesman has not done that! It is not as a traitor to my country that I repudiate war: I repudiate war as a decent German, who, even as a soldier, remained decent, and who is determined to be decent in the future." (p. 1135)

17 March 1935: "The German people wants no war. It wants to be peaceful and happy. It wants, above all, to be able to respect itself." (p. 1211)

 

[techsamatar]

@The alchemist @Khaemwaset Lets Give 1939 now and Lets see if This man changed his mind and wanted war hmmmm lets check.

1 April 1939: We have no thought of going to war with other peoples, always under the condition that they leave us in peace. (p. 1598)

28 April 1939: Mr. Roosevelt believes, further, that in case of war victorious, vanquished, and neutral nations will all suffer. He also declares that I have repeatedly asserted that I and the German people have no desire for war and that if this is true there need be no war.
Answer: I wish to point out firstly that I have not conducted any war, secondly that for years past I have expressed my abhorrence of war and, it is true, also my abhorrence of war-mongers, and thirdly that I am not aware for what purpose I should wage a war at all. (pp. 1638-40)

May 1, 1939: That we love peace I do not need to stress. (p. 1660)

May 1, 1939: "That I love peace appears perhaps most clearly from my work: in that lies the difference between me and these war-mongers....And how many of these works will need ten or twenty years before they are completed! I have then good reason enough to wish for peace. But these agitators have no use for peace; since they create nothing for peace, they are not working for peace." (p. 1661)

4 June 1939: "No people and no Government will wage war for war’s own sake. Only in the brain of perverse Jewish litterateurs can the idea be entertained that anyone can make war from sheer joy in killing or bloodshed." (p. 1667)

4 June 1939: I see, on the contrary, in the memory of the four years of the War, which I myself thanks to the favour of Providence had the good fortune to share, only a ground for the proudest confidence in my German people and, as a soldier, in my own person. These years make me in the depths of my being wishful for peace, since I recognize the frightful horrors of war, but also at the same time resolute in my conviction of the value of the German soldier in the defence of our rights. (p. 1669)

27 August 1939: As an old soldier of the front line I know, as you do, the horrors of war. It is from this outlook and knowledge that I, too, have honestly striven to remove all grounds for conflict between our two peoples. (p. 1693)

27 August 1939: That on this question our two peoples should have to enter on a fresh, bloody war of annihilation is not only for you, Monsieur Daladier, but also for me very painful. But, as I said before, I see no way in which we can influence Poland so that she should see reason and be prepared to rectify a situation which for the German people and the German Reich is intolerable. (pp. 1697-98)