He may be self-taught or studied in the Mosque, what is certain is the fact that he knows his stuff. You don't need a university degree to be a Sheikh or Islamic scholar, many talibul Ilm people still study in the classical way.Just curious, where did Daniel Haqiqatjou study Islam?
Just curious, where did Daniel Haqiqatjou study Islam?
He may be self-taught or studied in the Mosque, what is certain is the fact that he knows his stuff. You don't need a university degree to be a Sheikh or Islamic scholar, many talibul Ilm people still study in the classical way.
He is not giving religious verdicts but quotes the Quran and Scholars and is exposing liberal agents by presenting what they have said and done themselves. He is doing a great job at it and has alerted many Muslims to these sinister plots. Allahuma Barik.
No, I don't know. As I said he knows his stuff so he doesn't need verification from any institution or Scholar. Islamic literature is easier to access nowadays.Do you know which Mosque or traditional institute he may have studied in or any established religious scholar (irrespective of Madhab) that has vouched for him?
Do you think a person who never studied the Deen can challenge scholars and point out their fallacies?He is still speaking on religious issues/matters. It would be good to know if he studied. Is there any established religious scholar that can vouch for him?
The other day he was insinuating that Prophet s.a.w of beating Aisha as a way to suggest that women don’t deserve unlimited kindness. It caused a storm and many actual scholars spoke up . What made it disturbing that he used an Islamqa fatwa but cut the rest that made it clear that the Prophet s.a.w never beat Aisha ect and that he did a jester on her that he has done to various male Sahabas when he was iterating something that was very important.He may be self-taught or studied in the Mosque, what is certain is the fact that he knows his stuff. You don't need a university degree to be a Sheikh or Islamic scholar, many talibul Ilm people still study in the classical way.
His last tweet about Aisha and the prophet ﷺ doesn't indicate lack of knowledge, as you put it, but it shows his selective use of Islamic content to score points without caring about the consequences.The other day he was insinuating that Prophet s.a.w of beating Aisha as a way to suggest that women don’t deserve unlimited kindness. It caused a storm and many actual scholars spoke up . What made it disturbing that he used an Islamqa fatwa but cut the rest that made it clear that the Prophet s.a.w never beat Aisha ect and that he did a jester on her that he has done to various male Sahabas when he was iterating something that was very important.
He needs to stop speaking now. Khalaas.
It depends, a charitable argument would be lack of knowledge, but you’re right he is being selective but he isn’t knowledgeable and he betrays himself on the TL as of late anyways.His last tweet about Aisha and the prophet ﷺ doesn't indicate lack of knowledge, as you put it, but it shows his selective use of Islamic content to score points without caring about the consequences.
I think he has gone to the extreme in his fight with feminists and now labels every legitimate grievance of Muslim women as either false or exaggerated. I don't like his defense of Andrew Tate either.
I agree with you he needs to stop speaking about women but he should continue his job of exposing the deviants.
Hamza said what? Link pleaseThe other day he was insinuating that Prophet s.a.w of beating Aisha as a way to suggest that women don’t deserve unlimited kindness. It caused a storm and many actual scholars spoke up . What made it disturbing that he used an Islamqa fatwa but cut the rest that made it clear that the Prophet s.a.w never beat Aisha ect and that he did a jester on her that he has done to various male Sahabas when he was iterating something that was very important.
He needs to stop speaking now. Khalaas.
Are you blocked? Just log out and read the thread.Hamza said what? Link please