Cool. That's a great breakdown. Archeogenetic terms always confuse me. One more thing, what is Basal Eurasian? I see it used a lot on here.
It’s ghost lineage. Basically a hypothetical lineage.
Cool. That's a great breakdown. Archeogenetic terms always confuse me. One more thing, what is Basal Eurasian? I see it used a lot on here.
It’s alternative history and not necessarily true but who can trust mainstream historians anyway with their modified bias and prejudice?
Göbekli Tepe is located in southeast Turkey. Just across the border from Syria. It’s within the Fertile Crescent, one of the proposed locations for the Afro-Asiatic urheimat. The other one being lower Egypt in the Nile valley. The truth is most likely a mixture of both (lower Egypt + southwestern Levant).
It’s also agreed by most linguists that proto Afro-Asiatic was a spoken language in 10.000BCE. This is when Göbekli Tepe was established. Some linguists believe that Afro-Asiatic was a spoken langauge as early as 16.000 BCE hence my belief that these ancestors of ours could be the survivors of a lost civilization.
The EEF (ENF) from Anatolia seem to be a mixture of Anatolian Hunter Gatherers and Natufians or a Natufian like group. There’s also the linguistic hypothesis that the EEF spoke an Afro-Asiatic language based on the proto Indo-European loanword Taurus (bull), most likely from the Afro-Asiatic root word Awr (bull). @Apollo created a thread about it.
ENF had no natufian ancestry.
And Göbeklitepe was ENF (Anatolian hunter-gatherer) or Natufian?