Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds;
I wonder why kufr apologists try hard to link any thing they don't like to Islam. Kufr is disgusting and so, its beliefs and "campaigns".
Medically speaking;
Complications are immediate and late, physical and psychosexual, minor and serious, even fatal. The causes are the type of operation and the operator.
An extensive operation common to Sudan consists of removal of the whole clitoris, the whole of the labia minora, and part of the labia majora. Complications common with
pharaonic or Sudanese circumcision (
My note: Not type Ia) include painful scarkeloid formation, labial adhesions, cysts of the clitoris, vulval disfigurement, vaginal calculi, tight circumcision, infertility, and urinary complications. Psychosexual complications include a feeling of reduced feminity; diminished desire for coitus; diminished coital frequency; dyspareunia, apareunia or vaginismus; lack of orgasm; anal intercourse; depression and psychotic states; and, social problems. With infibulation come obstetric complications. Vaginal examination during labor may be difficult; catheterization of bladder is difficult; second stage of labor is delayed; tearing or splitting of the circumcison scar is unavoidable; injury of the vagina, cervix, and fetal scalp; and, soft-tissue obstruction by the vulval skin diaphragm contributes to the production of a vesicovaginal fistula.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12336839
Any medical gynecologist can tell you the problem lies only in types other than
Type Ia. However, due to lack of skillful personnels, sometimes the practice is done with excess, causing great harm to the girls who undergo the procedure.That's why there is a tendency to prohibit this habit.
Islamically speaking;
This practice was accepted by some of the classical schools of law and is practiced today by some Muslims.
The basis in Islamic law is that it is not permissible to cause bodily harm and any such practice of female circumcision proven to be harmful would be unlawful.
Ubaida ibn As-Samit reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
لاَ ضَرَرَ وَلاَ ضِرَارَ
Do not cause harm or return harm.
Source: Sunan ibn Majah 2340, Grade: Hasan
There are a few weak traditions used to sanction the practice, but upon scrutiny we find that none of them are authentic.
Usama ibn Umair reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
الْخِتَانُ سُنَّةٌ لِلرِّجَالِ مَكْرُمَةٌ لِلنِّسَاءِ
Circumcision is a sunnah for men and honorable for women.
Source: Musnad Ahmad 20195, Grade: Da’eef (weak)
Umm Atiyyah reported: A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina and the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
لَا تُنْهِكِي فَإِنَّ ذَلِكَ أَحْظَى لِلْمَرْأَةِ وَأَحَبُّ إِلَى الْبَعْلِ
Do not cut severely, as it is better for the woman and more desirable for the husband.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawud 5271, Grade: Da’eef (weak)
http://abuaminaelias.com/does-islam-support-female-genital-mutilation-fgm/
http://www.ahlalhdeeth.com/vb/showpost.php?p=68900&postcount=3
Famous scholars of Islam based their fiqh on quran and "
authentic" hadith. That's obvious to any children.
Imam Abu Hanifah: “
If a hadith is found to be authentic, then it is my madhab.”
’
When I say something contradicting the Book of Allah the Exalted or what is narrated from the Messenger
, then ignore my saying.’’
Imam Malik: “
Everyone after the Prophet will have their statements accepted or rejected except the Prophet.”
Imam Shafi: “
Every hadith of the Prophet is my position even if you did not hear it from me.”
Imam Ahmad: “
If one rejects a hadith of the Messenger of Allah, they will be at the brink of destruction.”
Unfortunately in recent times many statements by these great scholars of Islamic law have been taken out of context and sometimes used to substantiate an adopted ideologies by certain individuals and groups. However, if a scholar thinks of an evidence as true, and later the evidence was proved to be Daiif, then that's no longer his position as they explicitly stressed.
http://muslimmatters.org/2012/12/04/maqasid-al-shariah/
. Seems that you've confused yourself. How exactly is removing the foreskin of the clitoris equivalent to mutilation? You can't throw around terms you don't understand. Just admit it, you didn't even know that mutilation and circumcision weren't the same thing. Explain to me how it's mutilation. Explain how it's even comparable to having the clitoris removed and the vagina sewed up. It isn't, simple. One is mutilation, the other is circumcision. I swear you Somali europhiles will jump on to anything propped up by non Muslims. Is male circumcision mutilation too?
