Who's "you guys?" I'm confused about this part.
The FGS won't come out and condemn anyone directly, because everyone from the qabil of the regional president will turn against the FGS. We are an ignorant nation, in love with politics, yet ignorant of political mechanism's and tactful behavior as a united nation.
I'm not personally pinning anyone against anyone. Legally, which is what international politics runs on, is from where I speak.
Even if my regional leader is himself only a governor, that's something that HE'S accepted and agreed to by signing the federal constitutional agreements, as i'm sure the sultans and ugaas' etc have also signed.
I am
NOT my regional leader, even if he's from my qabil. His actions are his, and I don't have to defend him against anyone.
We need to stop equating a regional leader with a neo-sultan, a modern representative of specific qabils.
So you understand, that i'm not posting from a point of emotion here but from a perspective of International Politics, let's understand the legal and de facto understanding and definitions of a few key words, so you can see that i'm not involving emotions.
The legal title of President, is one who has supreme executive power and isn't answerable to any higher authority within his country.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/president
president noun
(the
title given to) the
person who has the
highest political position in a
country that is a
republic and who, in some of these
countries, is the
leader of the
government:
President Kennedy
the president of France
No regional leader has this power. Silanyo and Gaas, in the eyes of international law, have the same limited executive power.
A regional FS is a
state, but not a
nation state, or in its proper term in international law,
a sovereign state
"A sovereign state is, in
international law,
a nonphysical juridical entity that is represented by one centralized government that has sovereignty over a geographic area. International law defines sovereign states as having a permanent population, defined territory,
one government, and the capacity to enter into
relations with other sovereign states.
[1] "
No FS president has complete sovereignty over his state. I'm not trying to antagonize anyone and i'm saying this with all due respect.
I deal with facts, not opinions when it comes to this area.
It doesn't matter what we call them, or what they call themselves. International law is black and white. There's no gray area.