Iโm all about dismantling the influence and soft power of Westernization/Secularism in the Muslim world and I think one of the most effective means of doing so is by banning the English (or any Western language) language from being taught in our countries. I cringe when I hear some stories about local Somalis who were born and raised back home insult other Somalis who were born and raised back home but do not speak English. If we adopt their culture (which includes language) then it creates an inferiority complex in many Muslims who will seek to imitate Westerners in dress, customs and of course, attitudes and beliefs which run contrary to Islamic values and beliefs. European armies might have pulled their armies out of many Muslim countries and granted them โindependenceโ but thereโs even a worst plague thatโs worst than military colonialism, it is the colonialism of the mind.
The English language is not necessary to teach in Muslim countries. All the scientific, philosophical and necessary knowledge that is produced in the English language should be translated in Somali and especially Arabic Fusha (classical/modern standard Arabic).
Fusha Arabic (Classical/modern standard Arabic) should be the lingua franca of every Muslim just like Hebrew is the lingua franca of every Jew. The Arabic language is a symbol of Islam and it should be prioritized over every other foreign language.
@Abu Ashโari,
I disagree, but let me first ask a couple of questions for clarity?
a) Does this include European Muslims including Turks, Bosnians, and other native European Musims in France, UK etc? If no, the premise of your argument presumes there are no Muslims in Europe, which is a fallacy. From what I have observed I am of the opinion Muslims in Europe, and elsewherein the West are truelly the de facto [Muslims] whereas those in the Muslim world are so by accident, if name. A good example is Gulf States where Islam is not being taught at schools.
b) You seem to be assuming Muslims are an island unto themselves. Reflect for a moment, how Muslims would influence other societies and cultures, if they do not learn their languages, exchange "ideas", and teach them theirs?
i) How would great minds the likes of ibn Sina (modern medicine), al Kindi (maths - awarding the world Bhrami numericals adopted from the Muslim Mughal empire of Hindustan), and others of Persian extraction be influenced by earlier Muslims, or influence Muslims, and non-Muslims alike? How would scholars like of Mohamed Assad be influenced, if one does not converse in English with him?
Here are the reasons:
b) Muslims derive a great of deal of knowledge and wisdom from being exposed to other societies and cultures, especially those they share close proximity, and history. After all, Iberia was one of the cradles of Muslim civilisation.
i) Here, your assumption comes across as shortsighted, if flawed, and one could go as far as to cite it xenophobic.
Postscript:
c) I agree every Muslim ought to learn Fusha, and unless there is a similar renaissance as that of Harun al Rashid, where knowledge was trasfered from foreign languages including Greek and Latin, and transcribed in Arabic, Muslims would be handicapped in industry and technology.
d) I would be so bold as to advise Muslims to learn Chinese, for doing so shall advance their exchange with those in the Sino sphere, and influence.
e) On the question concerning Western decadency, perhaps Muslims ought to do a better job of closely examining our beloved society rather than seeking scapegoat. From what I observed, there is now more debauchery in the Muslim world than in the US, of which majority, outside of the Coasts, pursue, or claim to, pseudo traditional norms. In its debauchery, Vegas pales in comparison to Dubai or Marakhesh just for reflection in less serious passing.
I shall halt there for the moment.