Do You Think Sharia Law is Good?

Do you think sharia law is good?


  • Total voters
    77
Yes, it’s good. Is it operable in the west maybe!

View attachment 265905
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
What are we going to do with these polls made by sketchy people and Mexican "Reverts" calling for "Sharia" which just means law. I'm sure many of these sketchy people are on here because some garac fools always advocate for Sharia law which you only heard about post 2014. I'm damn sure many of you miskeen gulable Somalis would fall for an informant or even an Al Shabab recruiter. No wonder Somalia has a terrorist issue.
 

Internet Nomad

✪𝕲𝖔𝖓𝖊 ≋4≋ 𝕾𝖚𝖒𝖒𝖊𝖗✪
If "Sharia law" was a requirement for Islam. Then these nations would be kafir nations if they don't "really" have sharia. You'd have no argument against Al Shabab vs the government since they are fighting those who don't rule by sharia.
The government choose democracy over sharia which is kufr. However Al-Shabab are khawarij, So they Also go to the hellfire. I just think its a matter off which is less evil to the population.

If Al-Shabab wasn't batshit crazy with bombing and actually governed with sharia and naxriiis then they would look so much better.

The sharia depends on who is running it. They cannot be a person who is cruel to their people inshallah.
That's the whole point sharia isn't out to get anyone. in the prophet's time less then a handful of people received the punishment and that was because they came out and admitted to it of there own accord. No one was ever actually caught in the act and to realistically be caught you have to basically be doing this publicly.

Mā‘iz ibn Mālik al-Aslami (may Allah be pleased with him) went to the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) while he was in the mosque and confessed to having committed adultery. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) turned away from him, hoping that he would retract his statement and repent to Allah in secret. Yet, Mā‘iz was angry with himself, and he was determined to purify his soul through the prescribed punishment. Hence, he went to face the Prophet from the other side and again confessed to having committed adultery. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) once more turned his face to the other side, and he kept doing so until Mā‘iz confessed to having committed adultery four times. Afterwards, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him if he was suffering from any form of insanity, and he answered in the negative. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) then asked his family about the state of his mind, and they said that he was fine. The Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) then asked him if he was (currently or previously) married or a virgin, as the punishment of the virgin does not amount to stoning. He told him that he was married. Furthermore, the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) asked him if he had committed complete adultery, and not merely touching or kissing, but the man admitted to having committed complete adultery. After the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) had made sure of the veracity of all of those conditions which require the implementation of the legal prescribed punishment, he ordered his Companions to take the man and stone him to death. They took him to Baqī‘ al-Gharqad [a place where the funeral prayer is performed in Madīnah] and stoned him.
 
What do we mean by Islamic law 'Shari'a law'? How does Islamic law compare with Roman law (from which Common law, mostly practised in the English speaking world with its roots in the Bible, as in Shari'a al Masih, and with some in Shar'a al Musa); on the same token, when speaking of Islamic law, one is speaking of 'Fiqi', which has its roots in the Qur'an.

Precedent, which is whence law, excluding judiciary, particularly Common law, has its foundation, deriving esteem from morality and ethics heavily influenced by religion, Christianity in the case of Common law.

Let us now pitch Islamic law versus Common law, and in doing so, and for a meaningful discourse, let us map out what areas of law apply in the following pertinent areas:
a) Contracts,
b) Tort,
c) Property,
d) Inheritance,
e) Personal to name some core aspects of law.

How does the former compare with, and to the latter under each of the said areas, and observe wherein one finds equity, and just.
 
The government choose democracy over sharia which is kufr. However Al-Shabab are khawarij, So they Also go to the hellfire. I just think its a matter off which is less evil to the population.
So what you’re basically saying by is that the government is upon kufr so that would not make Al Shabab khawirij. Khawarij are those who rebel against a Muslim state and even they are better than those who commit kufr. For you brainwashed fools, your rhetoric proves Al Shabab’s ideology. Killing innocents makes you an oppressive sinner not a khariji.
 
Al Shabab are khawarji because they rebelled against a Muslim government not because they killed innocents because that would make Sadaam a khariji or Hajaaj bin Yusuf.
 

Internet Nomad

✪𝕲𝖔𝖓𝖊 ≋4≋ 𝕾𝖚𝖒𝖒𝖊𝖗✪
So what you’re basically saying by is that the government is upon kufr so that would not make Al Shabab khawirij. Khawarij are those who rebel against a Muslim state and even they are better than those who commit kufr. For you brainwashed fools, your rhetoric proves Al Shabab’s ideology. Killing innocents makes you an oppressive sinner not a khariji.
Al Shabab are khawarji because they rebelled against a Muslim government not because they killed innocents because that would make Sadaam a khariji or Hajaaj bin Yusuf.
Al Shabab are Khawariji because they spill the blood of muslims way too easily.

Its not within islam to blow up a random lady working on a corner shop trying to feed her family.
 
Al Shabab are Khawariji because they spill the blood of muslims way too easily.

Its not within islam to blow up a random lady working on a corner shop trying to feed her family.
Spilling the blood of the Muslims was done by Hajaaj. Was he a khariji? What about the Abbasids who wiped out the Umawids? What about the Ottomans? Khariji means a rebel against a Muslim state or institution. You don’t need to kill to be a khariji.
 

Internet Nomad

✪𝕲𝖔𝖓𝖊 ≋4≋ 𝕾𝖚𝖒𝖒𝖊𝖗✪
@Internet Nomad
How does Al shabaab differ from, or compare with Taliban?
Taliban have many issues i am not going to act like they are angels but at least the Taliban were fighting off an invading force.
Al-Shabaab are just terrorist who use islamic rhetoric for example suicide bombing is a massive sin. I understand democracy is kufr i just reject the way al-shabab operate.
 
Taliban have many issues i am not going to act like they are angels but at least the Taliban were fighting off an invading force.
Al-Shabaab are just terrorist who use islamic rhetoric for example suicide bombing is a massive sin. I understand democracy is kufr i just reject the way al-shabab operate.
By invading, I am assuming you mean Uncle Sam? Who do you think runs the project that is of Somalia, from financing to decision making of daily operations? What do you think sub-stations in Hargeysa, Bosaso, Xamar, and Kismayo are for? And their mother station in Jibouti?
 

Internet Nomad

✪𝕲𝖔𝖓𝖊 ≋4≋ 𝕾𝖚𝖒𝖒𝖊𝖗✪
Well that happened when Muhammad Al Fatih unleashed his cannons into Constantinople killing thousands with Muslims included. This does not make one a khariji.
Thats different as im sure those people were unintentional collateral damage
Spilling the blood of the Muslims was done by Hajaaj. Was he a khariji? What about the Abbasids who wiped out the Umawids? What about the Ottomans? Khariji means a rebel against a Muslim state or institution. You don’t need to kill to be a khariji.
Im sure that many unnecessary killing moments of muslims waging war on each other happened in history and i disavow that.

I explained my side enough what is your side? Do you believe in Sharia? Do you want Somalia to be Sharia?
 

Internet Nomad

✪𝕲𝖔𝖓𝖊 ≋4≋ 𝕾𝖚𝖒𝖒𝖊𝖗✪
By invading, I am assuming you mean Uncle Sam? Who do you think runs the project that is of Somalia, from financing to decision making of daily operations? What do you think sub-stations in Hargeysa, Bosaso, Xamar, and Kismayo are for? And their mother station in Jibouti?
If they do run all these projects then we need to raise political awareness around this and unfortunately use democracy (the system in place) to steer the politicians away.

Its like how Communist would work within the capitalist government to bring about communism.

You have to use intelligence to gauge what is better revolution or working within the system.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top