Do You Think Sharia Law is Good?

[Shaygoosh]

Yes, it’s good. Is it operable in the west maybe!

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[Doctorabdi]

How many muslim countries, have Actual Sharia law?

 

[Doctorabdi]

Sharia law bc it brings order and paves the way for a blossoming fantastic civilisation.

Have you got books. I'd love to study about Sharia Law. Gizkullah

 

[dekiteshim]

https://muslimskeptic.com/2022/10/30/latest-arab-youth-survey/

Even muslims in muslim nations are turning to sharia for a answer.

The young generation who are meant to be the most progressive have turned their backs on democracy.

Such is the cycle in the Middle East. Arabs clamour for Sharia and then when it arrives they end up begging for secularism. Arab nations are stable and prosperous when they are secular. Then when these secular leaders are deposed or undermined, everything burns down (Syria and even Iraq to some extent come to mind)

 

[Barni]

Xagee hogaanku kuugu go'ay.

If u r gonna say something to me say it in english.

 

[tyrannicalmanager]

Such is the cycle in the Middle East. Arabs clamour for Sharia and then when it arrives they end up begging for secularism. Arab nations are stable and prosperous when they are secular. Then when these secular leaders are deposed or undermined, everything burns down (Syria and even Iraq to some extent come to mind)

would rather live in Assad control syria or Saudi Arabia?

 

[dekiteshim]

would rather live in Assad control syria or Saudi Arabia?

Syria pre-war was lovely. Literally a tourist hotspot. So yes, a Syria where Assad is actually in control instead of fighting American funded rebels and khawarij Islamists is preferable. Sharia is not at all why Saudi Arabia is developed lol. It helps to sit on the second largest oil reserve in the world

 

[al-Mu'tamid المعتمد]

Despite the vehement opposition some may express towards the Shari'a, it remains an immutable truth that they will ultimately be judged by it, both in the present and the hereafter, by decree.

 

[reer]

Such is the cycle in the Middle East. Arabs clamour for Sharia and then when it arrives they end up begging for secularism. Arab nations are stable and prosperous when they are secular. Then when these secular leaders are deposed or undermined, everything burns down (Syria and even Iraq to some extent come to mind)

powerful empires were religious not secular. the only recent powerful secular empire was the soviet union which was atheist.

 

[dekiteshim]

powerful empires were religious not secular. the only recent powerful secular empire was the soviet union which was atheist.

The age of empires is over. The global consensus is that imperialism is a negative. Even then, these empires didn’t subject religious laws onto their subjects for the most part

 

[Internet Nomad]

Such is the cycle in the Middle East. Arabs clamour for Sharia and then when it arrives they end up begging for secularism. Arab nations are stable and prosperous when they are secular. Then when these secular leaders are deposed or undermined, everything burns down (Syria and even Iraq to some extent come to mind)

If we skip the history of the middle east for the past 1300 years and look past all this mental and physical colonialism then it appears that way.

The only time the middle east thrived in the past thousand years was under sharia.

 

[dekiteshim]

If we skip the history of the middle east for the past 1300 years and look past all this mental and physical colonialism then it appears that way.

The only time the middle east thrived in the past thousand years was under sharia.

Ok, Europe thrived even more under Christian and Enlightenment ideals in the same time period. Should we go and install Christian theocracy worldwide?

The reason these places thrived was because of imperialism which under the current geopolitical climate and foreseeable future is a BIG no no. The nation state is King now and the Caliphate isn’t coming back in this lifetime.

 

[tyrannicalmanager]

Syria pre-war was lovely. Literally a tourist hotspot. So yes, a Syria where Assad is actually in control instead of fighting American funded rebels and khawarij Islamists is preferable. Sharia is not at all why Saudi Arabia is developed lol. It helps to sit on the second largest oil reserve in the world

most of the people living in idlib would flee if Assad took over. this reason why Assad handlers in Russia decided with turkey to not advance any futher in "liberating" Syria to not cause another refugee crisis.

 

[Internet Nomad]

Ok, Europe thrived even more under Christian and Enlightenment ideals in the same time period. Should we go and install Christian theocracy worldwide?

The reason these places thrived was because of imperialism which under the current geopolitical climate and foreseeable future is a BIG no no. The nation state is King now and the Caliphate isn’t coming back in this lifetime.

They did do well under those systems but only 1 is from God.( i understand you are a christian and you disagree with that point howe

The muslim nation have all the resources they need within their own lands their is no need for colonialisation all muslims need is good governance.

Also there is always a chance for the caliphate to come back.

 

[dekiteshim]

most of the people living in idlib would flee if Assad took over. this reason why Assad handlers in Russia decided with turkey to not advance any futher in "liberating" Syria to not cause another refugee crisis.

The occupation in Idlib ran out thousands of Christians. Assad would rightly be de-Jihadifying the province

 

[tyrannicalmanager]

The occupation in Idlib ran out thousands of Christians. Assad would rightly be de-Jihadifying the province

using minorities as a shield won't won't cut it if more than 90% of the population are oppressed.

 

[hippy60]

Do you think it's good ? Ayo my boy it's either follow the laws of GOD or burn in hell you damn goofy .

Acting like a tiktok question THE f*ck

 

[Wild daisy 💐🌻💮]

Yes, from a secular standpoint, Sharia law is needed due to the way it maintains the natural order. For instance, there are no trans persons who believe they are an entirely distinct gender under Sharia law. Cities will be safer, for illustration, in Saudi Arabia, in which individuals can leave their purses or electronic devices and return to find them still there. However, I believe that sharia law will not be implemented until the mehdi arrives. Countries with Sharia law, such as Iran, are driving people away from Islam because they utilize Sharia law to maintain control.

 

[dekiteshim]

using minorities as a shield won't won't cut it if more than 90% of the population are oppressed.

Stopping Sunnis from engaging in pogroms is not oppression

 

[tyrannicalmanager]

Stopping Sunnis from engaging in pogroms is not oppression

mutilating boys isn't stopping christian oppression, also you're in a Sunni forum. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.al...1/tortured-and-killed-hamza-al-khateeb-age-13