DNA Or 4 Wittnesses?

Should DNA Be Used, Or 4 wittnesses?

  • Yes, DNA should be used because it is reliable

    Votes: 27 81.8%

  • Only 4 wittnesses.

    Votes: 1 3.0%

  • DNA should only be used if 4 wittnesses aren't available.

    Votes: 5 15.2%
  • Total voters
    33
Status
Not open for further replies.
AussieHustler

AussieHustler

Lum said:
I am just a layman, like yourself.
Click to expand...

@Lum

You are no longer a layman, you defend everything Saudi, therefore you are a stakeholder on the Saudi side. You even echoed their crap of putting Najd in Iraq when even Saudi Children know that this region is in Saudi Arabia and posted the insults of Saudis against Sheikh Imran because he made them incensed politically when the later supported the Syrian president and called for Muslims to align themselves with Putin and not Trump.
 
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
AussieHustler said:
@Lum

You are no longer a layman, you defend everything Saudi, therefore you are a stakeholder on the Saudi side. You even echoed their crap of putting Najd in Iraq when even Saudi Children know that this region is in Saudi Arabia and posted the insults of Saudis against Sheikh Imran because he made them incensed politically when the later supported the Syrian president and called for Muslims to align themselves with Putin and not Trump.
Click to expand...
The Muslim society consists of the laymen and the scholar.
 
AussieHustler

AussieHustler

Lum said:
What good would criticizing him do? Do you want the people to rebel? Which Shaykh insults Muslim countries?
Click to expand...

@Lum

Since you called yourself a layman and you don't live there, you can think for yourself and say, that is wrong, can't you? Maybe, the Saudi sheikhs will curse you and you won't do it. Ma sidaas baa?
 
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
AussieHustler said:
@Lum

You are no longer a layman, you defend everything Saudi, therefore you are a stakeholder on the Saudi side. You even echoed their crap of putting Najd in Iraq when even Saudi Children know that this region is in Saudi Arabia and posted the insults of Saudis against Sheikh Imran because he made them incensed politically when the later supported the Syrian president and called for Muslims to align themselves with Putin and not Trump.
Click to expand...
Najd is Iraq as Shaykh Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albanee (Rahimahullah) mentioned.
 
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
AussieHustler said:
@Lum

Since you called yourself a layman and you don't live there, you can think for yourself and say, that is wrong, can't you? Maybe, the Saudi sheikhs will curse you and you won't do it. Ma sidaas baa?
Click to expand...
Why? Did Prophet (allallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) order it? No. He said obey the Muslim leader.
 
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
AussieHustler said:
@Lum

Since you called yourself a layman and you don't live there, you can think for yourself and say, that is wrong, can't you? Maybe, the Saudi sheikhs will curse you and you won't do it. Ma sidaas baa?
Click to expand...
Why would they curse me? It`s deen. We referer back to the Quran, Sunnah and how the pious predecessors understood it.
 
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
AussieHustler said:
@Lum

Sheikh Albanee isn't a historian or someone who studied and graduated from a university, he was a Jordanian watch repairer who studied Hadiths from another Shaykh. Najd is in Saudi Arabia.

Click to expand...
Are you joking he already explained it? Najd refers to Iraq. Which scholars do you listen? Are they the ones who are feeding you this?
 
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
Why does almost everyone on this forum believe Saudi Arabia to be evil?
 
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr (d. 463) is from the Mālikī scholars and he said in al-Iistidhkār (5/16):





وَأَمَّا جَمَاعَةُ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَأَئِمَّتُهُمْ فَقَالُوا هَذَا هُوَ الِاخْتِيَارُ أَنْ يَكُونَ الْإِمَامُ فَاضِلًا عَالِمًا عَدْلًا مُحْسِنًا قَوِيًّا عَلَى الْقِيَامِ كَمَا يَلْزَمُهُ فِي الْإِمَامَةِ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فَالصَّبْرُ عَلَى طَاعَةِ الْإِمَامِ الْجَائِرِ أَولَى مِنَ الْخُرُوجِ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّ فِي مُنَازَعَتِهِ وَالْخُرُوجِ عَلَيْهِ اسْتِبْدَالَ الْأَمْنِ بِالْخَوْفِ وَإِرَاقَةَ الدِّمَاءِ وَانْطِلَاقَ أَيْدِي الدَّهْمَاءِ وَتَبْيِيتَ الْغَارَاتِ عَلَى الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَالْفَسَادَ فِي الْأَرْضِ وَهَذَا أَعْظَمُ مِنَ الصَّبْرِ عَلَى جَوْرِ الجائر


As for the jamāʿah of Ahl al-Sunnah, and their leading imāms, they said: This is the chosen (viewpoint) that the ruler (imām) should be virtuous, knowledgeable, just, righteous (muḥsin), strong in establishment (of his duty), as is required of him in leadership. And if he is not as such, then patience in obeying the tyrannical ruler is better than rebelling against him. This is because in contending for rule with him and rebelling against him leads to replacing security with fear and shedding of blood and and letting loose the hands of the common people, and the hatching of incursions (attacks) upon Muslims, and corruption on the earth. And this is greater (in evil) than patience upon tyranny of the tyrant.

Abū ʿIyaaḍ
1 Ramadan 1440 / 6 May 2019
 
AussieHustler

AussieHustler

Lum said:
Are you joking he already explained it? Najd refers to Iraq. Which scholars do you listen? Are they the ones who are feeding you this?
Click to expand...

@Lum

the salafis invented that it's historically in Iraq and that is why they desperately and poorly attempted and failed to distance themselves from the Hadith 'fitna from Najd' and referred it to Iraq. The Wahabis conveniently pushed Najd to Iraq but it didn't work.

@Cognitivedissonance

Boowe, you owe me this one.
 
Last edited:
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
AussieHustler said:
@Lum

the salafis invented that it's historically in Iraq and that is why they desperately and poorly attempted and failed to distance themselves from the Hadith 'fitna from Najd' and referred it to Iraq. The Wahabis conveniently pushed Najd to Iraq but it didn't work.

@Cognitivedissonance

Boowe, you owe me this one. .
Click to expand...

Wahhabis is a myth. The Christians used to call the Muslims "Mohammedans" to deceive their people. Nothing new. When someone preaches pure Tawheed you will get a lot of enemies. Especially when Saudi Arabia was drowning in shirk. He and the founder al-Saud cleansed it. The Imam (Rahimahullah) was given victory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending

Latest posts

Top