Did the romans ever try to conquer geeljires?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Basra

LOVE is a product of Doqoniimo mixed with lust
Let Them Eat Cake
VIP
It just occurred to me why didn't the mighty roman empire try to march south of africa? They probably heard legends of the mighty geeljires who lived in the south. Who would devour them and all their legion if their white asses ever tried marching south. I mean even scipio africanus called himself "Africanus" when he had only defeated carthage in the north, thinking he had conquered africa. I would have love to see the mighty romans try and march south into geeljire land like the persian king tried to.

shutterstock-203589544-1.jpg


South Africa????? Such a long distance to travel to SA. I think the reason Somalia was saved from Roman conquer is because the Arabs already conquered Somalia and Muslimized them. The Romans feared the arabs. They didnt show up in the battle of Tabuk. It is documented Hadiths
 
Last edited:

Puffin Stuff

Cheating death in berbera
Correction!!! all islam does is take away individuality from ppl so that they may sympathise with the poor and Madows of the world, who otherwise naturally would have been the lowest in the world. Religion was designed by god to tame the mighty so that they wouldn't kill the weakest.
The somali where impossiable to inslave refused to follow the white mans instructions if a white slave master was to whip a somali his clan would come to the whitemans house and hang all his family
 
Little secret is that the horn is filled with gold if the romans are bothered to dig it out. Plus why did they conquer armenia? they sometimes conquered just to show how powerful they were. Take alexander the great why did he want the shithole that is india? because he wanted to do what no man did before and conquer it.
:gucciwhat:have you got any idea about the many great civilizations that flourished on the indian subcontinent in ancient times?
Ancient india was far superior to us. They actually contributed heaps to the world, what have our people done? :ayaanswag:

Yea alexander was going to india just to say he conquered the world, he did it for the clout. Theres clout for fighting the indians, what clout is there for fighting somalis???:childplease:

Somalinimo is great but it has the tendency to cause fogged glasses and alter the reality.
images (3).jpeg
 

Puffin Stuff

Cheating death in berbera
Im not joking romans would of crushed the somali city states it would have been long and relatively bloody i mean if anything the somali's where in there very nature the worst kind of people you could conquer even if you did you'd have to conquer them by their rules and are prone to infighting one day the next they march up to the roman fort in the area burn it and kill the inhabitants then disperse like sand in the Sahara
 
Im not joking romans would of crushed the somali city states it would have been long and relatively bloody i mean if anything the somali's where in there very nature the worst kind of people you could conquer even if you did you'd have to conquer them by their rules and are prone to infighting one day the next they march up to the roman fort in the area burn it and kill the inhabitants then disperse like sand in the Sahara
If we were half as weak as you suggest then how come there is no recorded time in the history were somalis were enslaved? every nation who fell had it's citizens taken as slaves. I don't think we would have lost due our pride clouding our judgement and our natural savagery but rather it think it would have been a stalemate much like the crusades where the opposing party would realise that it costs more to hold places in somalia than to capture other territories.
 

Von

With blood and Iron will we reach the fatherland
Nothing passes Sudan, its the African graveyard of empires
 

Puffin Stuff

Cheating death in berbera
If we were half as weak as you suggest then how come there is no recorded time in the history were somalis were enslaved? every nation who fell had it's citizens taken as slaves. I don't think we would have lost due our pride clouding our judgement and our natural savagery but rather it think it would have been a stalemate much like the crusades where the opposing party would realise that it costs more to hold places in somalia than to capture other territories.
How does anything you said make sense? somali's as a majority weren't inslaved are you denying we where conquered? we where conolised it made no sense to enslave a somali would take easy offence to everything rebel almost instantly it was a dagger waiting to strike your back
 

Basra

LOVE is a product of Doqoniimo mixed with lust
Let Them Eat Cake
VIP
Nothing passes Sudan, its the African graveyard of empires


Actually u r right! Nothing passes the south Sudan! I listen to a recent hadith of the Caliphates conquering, the Arabs stopped at North Sudan, they couldn't proceed to south because the south Sudanese were menacing. They had a special was of fighting, throwing dangerous pebbles that targeted the arabs eyes and blinded them. I think it was Uthman ibn Khatab who said no more, lets withdraw. They were fighting with savage tools but very capable! And thats why north is mostly Muslims and south not, because the arabs couldn't get there. And All is Allah's qadr
 
The Romans did contemplate conquering the Somali city states because they were fooled by Somali merchants who were buying cinnamon for cheap from Indian merchants then selling them at much higher prices to the Romans. The Romans thought the cinnamon was grown in the Somali peninsula because the city states refused to allow the Indian merchants to trade at Roman ports. There are a bunch of books about the trade between Rome and India.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending

Latest posts

Top