I observe most of yous in ethnically diverse nations are less tolerant of diversity, and think similar to our nomadic grandparents, who grew up with and around ONLY people of their own cliques. Theirs had been shaped by their environment, but how were yours not influenced by your respective environs?
I further notice most come across as raging tiny tyrants brimming with bigotry: my way or the high way. Why?
Addendum:
Be careful othering Somali minorities. Put to aside the extraneous claim that the land belongs to his people alone, and consider the efficacy of the argument: disagreement with the legitimacy and the manner with which the Federal government is signing away contracts sans any consultation? MPs have not seen the details of the agreement. None of the FMSs had been consulted. No one has seen it. Except one man.
Then, the question becomes is he right in disagreeing, thereafter making said argument? I would contest, yes.
I am not opposed to Muslim nations operating in .So within the confines of the law, at an acceptable capacity, but I am in disagreement with the manner in which the FGS is operating on the periphery of the laws, breaching States autonomy, usurping its powers, overextending its authority sans any consultation.
If no, as most seem to have concluded, then how does he differ from another Somali disagreeing with the Federal government in engaging in illegal treaties?
Does that make him or I less Somali? Or will you now call for my deportation?