Biden uses laughing clip against Trump

[Helios]

All three aren’t set and are arguable in court, what if you were joking? What detriments treason or “direct violence” which definantly can’t get you in any real trouble outside petty litigation which won’t stand up in court

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/95-815.pdf

Here this is a more comprehensive list with supreme court citations

 

[Tukraq]

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/95-815.pdf

Here this is a more comprehensive list with supreme court citations

So child o which I don’t consider speech in the first place and should be illegal and “true threats”, these threats aren’t something that’s tangible that you can prove and thus wouldn’t hold up in court, this is why American make threats everyday and face no repercussions

 

[Helios]

So child o which I don’t consider speech in the first place and should be illegal and “true threats”, these threats aren’t something that’s tangible that you can prove and thus wouldn’t hold up in court, this is why American make threats everyday and face no repercussions

But my point is that your not going to be legally protected necessarily so your subject to the Governments whim.

 

[Tukraq]

But my point is that your not going to be legally protected necessarily so your subject to the Governments whim.

Not governments whim, courts which are basically random jurors whim, would be hard for jurors to unanimously convict you if you make a strong free speech defense case

 

[Helios]

Not governments whim, courts which are basically random jurors whim, would be hard for jurors to unanimously convict you if you make a strong free speech defense case

The courts will not side with someone who is openly preaching for bombings thats not going to stand.

 

[Tukraq]

The courts will not side with someone who is openly preaching for bombings thats not going to stand.

Not the courts jurors decide, takes just one or two who believe in free speech and the case made to them by defendants and he’s good to go

 

[Helios]

Not the courts jurors decide, takes just one or two who believe in free speech and the case made to them by defendants and he’s good to go

Go tell that to all the bomb plotters they exercised their right to 'free speech'.

 

[Tukraq]

Go tell that to all the bomb plotters they exercised their right to 'free speech'.

There’s a difference between bomb plotting and saying I’m gonna blow this place up

 

[Helios]

There’s a difference between bomb plotting and saying I’m gonna blow this place up

I agree but if the court decides you were for real then your free speech just got limited

 

[Tukraq]

I agree but if the court decides you were for real then your free speech just got limited

bomb plotting isn't speech

 

[Helios]

bomb plotting isn't speech

To the same thing as underage p*rn yet it is considered that way legally

 

[Tukraq]

To the same thing as underage p*rn yet it is considered that way legally

sxb those aren't speech and should be illegal I'm talking about words you say not actions you do

 

[Helios]

sxb those aren't speech and should be illegal I'm talking about words you say not actions you do

How about libel? That is restricted speech you cant legally spread lies to people or defraud them. There you go.

 

[Tukraq]

How about libel? That is restricted speech you cant legally spread lies to people or defraud them. There you go.

civil courts for that, possible lawsuits could go either way in the court, i.e. the Elon musk case currently

 

[Muji]

Lol the head of the EU

Wow this is so disrespectful lmao

How are they bullying him like this

@Factz @Basra @Tukraq
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ding-two-fingers-against-Trumps-like-gun.html

 

[Muji]

@Basra the sad thing is people are watching what is happening with the impeachment and know trump is living on borrowed time. There will be no reaction to his behaviour because Donald has been told to be on his best behaviour.

 

[Umm-al-Dhegdheeriyaa]

Princess Anne was ruthless for calling his voice dirty