Samaalic Era
QurboExit
Which strategy would you recommend and why?
Scorched earth will backfire to you@Calaf
One of the main reasons why unconventional warfare is suited to Somalia is because we are not a mountainous country. The civilian population would be at great risk and it would take too long and the damage and loss would be too great.
With Scorched earth policy, you engage the enemy and when you can no longer hold onto the city, would evacuate the civilian population and burn the city and supplies to the ground. Denying the enemy any base and resources has worked for countries with plain terrain
How will you eliminate the enemy when your losing ground while they gain ground and resources? UCW only works with rough terrain. Somalia is an arid plain, terrible for UCWScorched earth will backfire to you
With UCW, You eliminate anything and everything, in order to win
Since Somalia is a tribal country, you can use gurellia warfare, in since of UCW, to get a advantageHow will you eliminate the enemy when your losing ground while they gain ground and resources? UCW only works with rough terrain. Somalia is an arid plain, terrible for UCW
Against a formidable foe, the death toll could easily hit the Millions and for a small population like us, would spell the very end for us. The Peninsular war is a fine example aswell the Second Sino-Japanese warSince Somalia is a tribal country, you can use gurellia warfare, in since of UCW, to get a advantage
True.Against a formidable foe, the death toll could easily hit the Millions and for a small population like us, would spell the very end for us. The Peninsular war is a fine example aswell the Second Sino-Japanese war
If internal, then it works, if not then it is not useful!Against a formidable foe, the death toll could easily hit the Millions and for a small population like us, would spell the very end for us. The Peninsular war is a fine example aswell the Second Sino-Japanese war
I agree sxbIf internal, then it works, if not then it is not useful!
@Calaf
One of the main reasons why unconventional warfare is not suited to Somalia is because we are not a mountainous country. The civilian population would be at great risk and it would take too long and the damage and loss would be too great.
With Scorched earth policy, you engage the enemy and when you can no longer hold onto the city, would evacuate the civilian population and burn the city and supplies to the ground. Denying the enemy any base and resources has worked for countries with plain terrain
Thats a smart way of looking at it. Its true that in the north there are hills and some mountains which are good for UCW but there are none in the Central and Southern Somalia . I assume the same for GalbeedSomalia is a big country and won't have the same terrain for all the regions. Looking back at history, in the North, the Sayid fought an unconventional war because there were many hills and only small towns so they were carrying out many hit and runs. In the South, Xasan Barsane burnt down villages to stop the Italians exploiting the farmlands.
We took Galbeed with a conventional army, conventional weapons and with conventional warfare if im not mistaken sxbWe already have our own military style. Gorrila warfare from the ground supported by technicals (automatic weapon mounted on a SUV or Pick Up truck). And air support by the airforce ofcourse. This is how we took Somali galbeed back from Ethiopia.
You could say soWe took Galbeed with a conventional army, conventional weapons and with conventional warfare if im not mistaken sxb
Whether it was Ahmed Gurey or MSB it was a conventional war which made the ethiopians break. Ahmed Gurey beat 100,000 s with only 16,000 in the Battle of AntukyaYou could say so
In MSB case, you can say that it was unconventional in the eyes of SomalilandWhether it was Ahmed Gurey or MSB it was a conventional war which made the ethiopians break. Ahmed Gurey beat 100,000 s with only 16,000 in the Battle of Antukya
Somalia is a big country and won't have the same terrain for all the regions. Looking back at history, in the North, the Sayid fought an unconventional war because there were many hills and only small towns so they were carrying out many hit and runs. In the South, Xasan Barsane burnt down villages to stop the Italians exploiting the farmlands.
Whether it was Ahmed Gurey or MSB it was a conventional war which made the ethiopians break. Ahmed Gurey beat 100,000 s with only 16,000 in the Battle of Antukya
Don't know much about this so will come back to it when I read up on it a bit.I agree sxb
@Apollo @Factz @CaliTedesse @Mckenzie @land owner @Tukraq @Jaydaan @Abdalla @Arma
@geeljire madaxweyne
what do you guys think?
We took Galbeed with a conventional army, conventional weapons and with conventional warfare if im not mistaken sxb